Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Yejerla Amrutha Rajeshwari call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
<!-- End of MAIN HEADER --> | <!-- End of MAIN HEADER --> | ||
+ | |||
=<font size="5"> Approach </font>= | =<font size="5"> Approach </font>= | ||
Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
#There are 5 categories in quality score but description of these categories are not provided. Taking few samples in each category and running the autodetec() function on them revealed that category "A" recordings have good quality. | #There are 5 categories in quality score but description of these categories are not provided. Taking few samples in each category and running the autodetec() function on them revealed that category "A" recordings have good quality. | ||
# Atleast 4 recordings for each species- 2 calls, 2 songs(or any other distribution applicable based on the species) are sampled. Components are retrieved and top 5 components based on Signal to Noise ratio are selected. Few most representative spectrographs of each species are documented for comparisons with test recordings. | # Atleast 4 recordings for each species- 2 calls, 2 songs(or any other distribution applicable based on the species) are sampled. Components are retrieved and top 5 components based on Signal to Noise ratio are selected. Few most representative spectrographs of each species are documented for comparisons with test recordings. | ||
+ | |||
=<font size="5">Species Call-Song Spectrographs </font>= | =<font size="5">Species Call-Song Spectrographs </font>= | ||
Line 207: | Line 209: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | |||
=<font size="5"> Species detection for Test files </font>= | =<font size="5"> Species detection for Test files </font>= | ||
Line 230: | Line 233: | ||
||[[File:2-autodetec.ls-th10-env.abs-bp1.10-smo300-midu0.05-mxdu0.5-pw1-p1 - Copy.jpeg|400px]] | ||[[File:2-autodetec.ls-th10-env.abs-bp1.10-smo300-midu0.05-mxdu0.5-pw1-p1 - Copy.jpeg|400px]] | ||
||[[File:Capture_2.PNG|400px]] | ||[[File:Capture_2.PNG|400px]] | ||
− | || Rose crested Blue Pipit along with others | + | || <b><font color="#C00000">Rose crested Blue Pipit along with others</font></b> |
− | |||
|- | |- | ||
Line 295: | Line 297: | ||
||[[File:9-autodetec.ls-th10-env.abs-bp1.10-smo300-midu0.05-mxdu0.5-pw1-p1.jpeg|400px]] | ||[[File:9-autodetec.ls-th10-env.abs-bp1.10-smo300-midu0.05-mxdu0.5-pw1-p1.jpeg|400px]] | ||
||[[File:Capture999.PNG|400px]] | ||[[File:Capture999.PNG|400px]] | ||
− | ||Rose crested Blue Pipit & Ordinary Snape | + | ||<b><font color="#C00000">Rose crested Blue Pipit & Ordinary Snape</font></b> |
Line 360: | Line 362: | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | From the above table, it is evident that at most 2 or 3 recordings belong to Rose crested Blue Pipit. Why | + | '''From the above table, it is evident that at most 2 or 3 recordings belong to Rose crested Blue Pipit. Why did Kaisos officials lie?''' |
Latest revision as of 10:58, 14 July 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approach
- Since we have bird recordings submitted by the Ornithology group and also the corresponding quality score, creating a spectograph for individual components of good quality recordings allows for visually profiling each species' calls and songs.
- There are 5 categories in quality score but description of these categories are not provided. Taking few samples in each category and running the autodetec() function on them revealed that category "A" recordings have good quality.
- Atleast 4 recordings for each species- 2 calls, 2 songs(or any other distribution applicable based on the species) are sampled. Components are retrieved and top 5 components based on Signal to Noise ratio are selected. Few most representative spectrographs of each species are documented for comparisons with test recordings.
Species Call-Song Spectrographs
Species detection for Test files
From the above table, it is evident that at most 2 or 3 recordings belong to Rose crested Blue Pipit. Why did Kaisos officials lie?