Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2016-17 T3 Assign ONG GUAN JIE JASON Conclusion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
=Summary Findings for Question 2= | =Summary Findings for Question 2= | ||
+ | |||
+ | * | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | =Summary Findings for Question 3= | ||
+ | |||
* | * |
Revision as of 14:04, 10 July 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
This section aims to present the key findings which were elaborated upon previously.
Summary Findings for Question 1
- Working sensors should be categorized by graphs with regular patterns.
- For instance on April, the detection of AGOC-3A by monitors 1 and 2 should be regular because both the trellis and cycle plot exhibit a relatively flat trend.
- Similarly for monitors 4-6, patterns are regular with reasonable fluctuations in readings throughout the month.
- However, there are instances where monitors appear to be malfunctioning as well. They are categorized by sharp spikes in readings which contradict the patterns displayed prior.
- For instance the trellis plot revealed that monitor 3 has a sharp spike on April and the cycle plot confirms it that readings were larger than usual on the 17th April. This is something unexpected.
- Monitor 8 also has a very high reading at 10:00 on the 15th April which is unlike its normal readings recorded during the month.
Summary Findings for Question 2