Difference between revisions of "JAR v.IS Project Proposal"
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| style="background:none;" width="1%" | | | style="background:none;" width="1%" | | ||
− | | style="padding:0.2em; font-size:100%; background-color:#f1cf0e; border-bottom:3px solid #476a37; border-top:3px | + | | style="padding:0.2em; font-size:100%; background-color:#f1cf0e; border-bottom:3px solid #476a37; border-top:3px solid #476a37;text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="10%" | |
[[JAR v.IS Project Proposal| <font color="#b1260e" size=2 face="Century Gothic"><b>PROJECT PROPOSAL</b></font>]] | [[JAR v.IS Project Proposal| <font color="#b1260e" size=2 face="Century Gothic"><b>PROJECT PROPOSAL</b></font>]] | ||
Revision as of 10:49, 17 January 2017
Click here to return to AY16/17 T2 Group List
Background | Data | Methodology |
---|
Motivation Currently, XYZ makes use of a unique ideation process for its content creation. However, we feel that this process can be improved with a data driven approach. By creating an actual documentation of what elements make up a good idea based on their historical data, XYZ will have a more structured ideation system that can be used to supplement their existing processes. This would increase the quality of ideas that are generated, that would translate to better articles and an improved bottom line for XYZ.
|