IS428 AY2019-20T2 Assign ONG LI TING: faculty

From Visual Analytics for Business Intelligence
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Library.jpg


OVERVIEW

DATA

VISUALIZATION

TASK ANSWERS

MISCELLANEOUS

Undergraduate

Graduate

Faculty

Staff


Analysis 1: Faculty staffs made up the minority of the survey respondents

F demo.jpg


Upon hovering on the selected bar chart:

F demo hover.jpg
Key Findings
  • The faculty staffs made up the minority of the survey respondents with associate and assistant professor being the highest, followed by professor and then lecturer.
  • Upon hovering on the highlight bar charts, we are presented with the faculty staffs study area. For associate professor and lecturer, the population are quite spread out across the different study area.
  • For assistant professor, we have lesser people from law and economics.
  • For professor, we have more people from business and economics.

Analysis 2: Li Ka Shing is the more preferred library overall

F preferred.jpg


Upon hovering on the selected bar chart:

F preferred hover.jpg
Key Findings
  • Li Ka Shing Library is the more preferred library over Kwa Geok Choo Library.
  • The number of faculty staffs prefer over Kwa Geok Choo Library can be counted manually due to its extremely low number at 24.
  • Faculty staffs from Business has the highest number of records for preferring Li Ka Shing Library over Kwa Geok Choo Library.
  • Faculty staffs for Law has the highest number of records for preferring Kwa Geok Choo Library over Li Ka Shing Library. This could be due to convenience based on distance. Kwa Geok Choo Library is nearer to SMU School of Law.
  • There is minimal difference in the overall satisfaction rate for Li Ka Shing Library and Kwa Geok Choo Library. This applies to faculty from all study areas.

Analysis 3: SMU Libraries resources are mostly utilised on a daily to weekly basis and faculty staffs visits to library ranges from monthly to quarterly

F freq.jpg
Key Findings
  • Faculty staffs use the SMU Libraries resources mostly on a daily - weekly basis.
  • Faculty staffs visit the campus mostly on a daily basis.
  • Faculty staffs visit the SMU Libraries mostly on a monthly to quarterly basis.

Analysis 4: The top 3 important services are – Information resources located in the library, help from library staff and library staff provides accurate answer

Importance Overall

F impt likert.jpg
Key Findings
  • By looking at which bar is more skewed towards the right, the perceived top 3 important services provided by SMU Libraries for the faculty staffs are:
  1. Information resources located in the library
  2. Help from library staff
  3. Library staff provides accurate answer
  • In terms of services by category, we can see that information & resources is of highest importance.
  • By looking at which bar is more skewed towards the left, the perceived last 3 important services provided by SMU Libraries for the faculty staffs are:
  1. Computer availability
  2. Library workshop, class & tutorials
  3. Opening hours

Performance Overall

F perf likert.jpg
Key Findings
  • By looking at which bar is more skewed towards the right, the perceived top 3 performance services provided by SMU Libraries for the faculty staffs are:
  1. Online enquiry services
  2. Off campus library resources assess
  3. Self service
  • By looking at which bar is more skewed towards the left, the perceived last 3 performance services provided by SMU Libraries for the faculty staffs are:
  1. Computer availability
  2. Quiet place in the library
  3. Printing, scanning & photocopying services

Comparing top perceived important services with perceived performance

F compare likert.jpg
Key Findings
  • All top 3 rated as importance services are perceived as “has met expectations” of the faculty.
  • For library information resources, there is only a slight discrepancy of 7.4% from 97.7% (importance) vs 90.3% (performance).
  • For help from library staff, there is only a slight discrepancy of 7.1% from 98.3% (importance) vs 91.2% (performance).
  • For Library staff provides accurate answer, there is only a slight discrepancy of 4.8% from 96.5% (importance) vs 91.7% (performance).


The figures are derived upon hovering over the selected bars. The calculation is done by summing up all the percentage for above neutral for importance and performance and then finding the difference between the 2 figures.

Analysis 5: There is a linear relation between the overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend the SMU Libraries’ services to another student

F correlation.jpg
Key Findings
  • There is a linear relation between the overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend the SMU Libraries’ services to another student.
  • The likelihood (high and above) for the faculty staff to recommend the SMU Libraries services to another student must score an overall satisfaction score of about 7 - 8 (measured by the darkness of the colour).

Analysis 6: The top 3 mentioned words are: Book (33 records), Student (31 records), Study (19 records).

Positive

G positive.jpg
Key Findings
  • The top 3 mentioned words are:
  1. Book (33 records)
  2. Student (31 records)
  3. Study (19 records)

Neutral

G neutral.jpg
Key Findings
  • The top 3 mentioned words are:
  1. Student (4 records)
  2. Service (3 records)
  3. Printer (2 records)

Negative

G neg.jpg
Key Findings
  • The top 3 mentioned words are:
  1. Law (1 record)
  2. Database (1 record)
  3. Course (1 record)

Overall

G overall.jpg
Key Findings
  • The top 3 mentioned words are:
  1. Student (31 records)
  2. Study (19 records)
  3. Seat (12 records)


  • As compared to the results from undergraduates, we can see that there is a higher difference in results (positive, negative, neutral) for the graduates. Overall, the most mentioned words are student, study and seat, which appears mostly in the positive rating category. This shows that continuous improvement has to be made to these 3 words to maintain the high overall satisfaction from the graduates.
  • For the neutral and negative rating category, there are too little records to justify a strategy plan for it. However, it should not be overlooked as well. The user should double check with the actual comments for higher accuracy.

Recommendations

Recommendations
  • Conduct another study with the graduates which are the 2nd key target market of SMU Libraries for future initiatives. The study method should be prepared for a high number of participants.
  • If needed, prioritise more effort in maintaining the libraries’ physical facilities over online resources as there is a higher traffic for offline libraries’ visits.
  • Distance may play a part to attract the graduates. So, if there are any future SMU Libraries initiatives event, it should be held at the centre of the campus. Ideally it can be held at school of accountancy.
  • Most of the graduates patronise Li Ka Shing Library more than Kwa Geok Choo, therefore if there is any SMU Libraries’ event catered to them, it should be held at Li Ka Shing Library.
  • All top 3 rated as importance services are perceived as “has met expectations” of the graduates. SMU Libraries should keep up the good work in these areas – Help from library staff, wifi access and library staff providing accurate answers.
  • It seems like the graduates prioritise service delivery more. A recommendation could be providing them with library orientation so that the graduates can be less reliant of the library staffs in future.
  • With the word cloud, conduct another survey more specified to the words mentioned to improve the future SMU Libraries satisfaction rate.