IS428 AY2019-20T1 Assign Wendy Ng Sock Ling Dashboard Design
|
|
|
|
Description | Visualization |
---|---|
1. Background and Navigation
|
|
2. Which neighbourhoods should be prioritised?
The bar chart in the middle shows the average extent of damage of all reports at the time selected for each location respectively. By selecting the location, the breakdown of the damage which can be seen on the right (empty if no location is selected). The location selected will be highlighted while all other locations are at the background in order to allow comparison of the damage by the facilities/ infrastructures. By hovering over circles that are not highlighted, the location can be viewed so as to enable responders to know which location is more damaged for the respective facility/infrastructure. For instance, in this picture the date and time "6/4/2020 12:00:00 AM" and location "2" are selected. As seen in the breakdown, although location 2 has the lowest average damage based on the bar chart, it has the highest damage on power. Hence, the responders might consider sending St. Himark's power department to location 2. |
|
3. Location with hardest hit
By clicking on an individual location, users can see the treemap with each box as the timestamp, the number of records as the size and the colour as the intensity of the damage. The colour changes from blue to red as the intensity increases. The user can also see the breakdown of the damage by the facility/ infrastructure. This enables user to make a decision on whether the damage has more consequences for the location or it might just be a small damage. For instance, the location 7 is selected in the picture. Although 7 has the highest average damage based on the reports, the root cause is the damage to the power. Other locations could have damage to buildings or roads which have worse consequences as it might costs losses of lives as compared to damages on power. |
|
4. Comparison of damage reports and earthquake shake map
|
|
5. Reports by location over time
|