Difference between revisions of "IS428 AY2019-20T1 Assign Wendy Ng Sock Ling Tasks"
Wendyng.2015 (talk | contribs) |
Wendyng.2015 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
<br>Firstly, looking at the earthquake shake map on 6 April (on the right), it looks like the earthquake has not hit the cities in St. Himark. This is aligned with the damage reports (on the left) where damages are low which are probably due to the shaking even though it is indicated as "not felt" in the earthquake shake map. | <br>Firstly, looking at the earthquake shake map on 6 April (on the right), it looks like the earthquake has not hit the cities in St. Himark. This is aligned with the damage reports (on the left) where damages are low which are probably due to the shaking even though it is indicated as "not felt" in the earthquake shake map. | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td>[[File:2.1 | + | <td>[[File:2.1 6 April 2020.png|center|600px|6 April 2020]]</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
<br>Looking at the damage reports and earthquake shake map on 8 April, the reports seem to show that location 3, 7, 8,9,10,11 and 14 are experiencing more damages than the rest of the locations based on the average damage. However, location such as location 4 and 12 which seem to have been hit by the earthquake in the shakemap do not seem to have much damages. Assuming that the Earthquake shake map is the most accurate, these locations does not seem to provide reliable reports. Nonetheless, when looked into location 4, the damage is highest on the medical facilities while location 12 has the highest damage on the power. This could just mean that these locations have strong infrastructure especially since location 4 has a nuclear plant which if destroyed can be disastrous. | <br>Looking at the damage reports and earthquake shake map on 8 April, the reports seem to show that location 3, 7, 8,9,10,11 and 14 are experiencing more damages than the rest of the locations based on the average damage. However, location such as location 4 and 12 which seem to have been hit by the earthquake in the shakemap do not seem to have much damages. Assuming that the Earthquake shake map is the most accurate, these locations does not seem to provide reliable reports. Nonetheless, when looked into location 4, the damage is highest on the medical facilities while location 12 has the highest damage on the power. This could just mean that these locations have strong infrastructure especially since location 4 has a nuclear plant which if destroyed can be disastrous. | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> | + | <td>[[File:2.2 8 April 2020.png|center|600px|8 April 2020]]</td> |
− | [[File:2.2 8 April 2020.png|center|600px|8 April 2020]]</td> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 87: | Line 86: | ||
<td><b> 2.3 Looking at the reports in each location </b> | <td><b> 2.3 Looking at the reports in each location </b> | ||
<br>Each location is analysed individually where the dot represent each report received. As seen from the visual, most locations have similar visual as location 1 where the dots are scattered all over the place showing the uncertainty in the reports received where some reports show very high damage while others show very low damage on the same infrastructure and facilities. Shake intensity on the other is rather consistent across all locations where reports show consistent intensity. | <br>Each location is analysed individually where the dot represent each report received. As seen from the visual, most locations have similar visual as location 1 where the dots are scattered all over the place showing the uncertainty in the reports received where some reports show very high damage while others show very low damage on the same infrastructure and facilities. Shake intensity on the other is rather consistent across all locations where reports show consistent intensity. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td>[[File:2.3 Location 1 report over time.png|center|600px]]</td> | <td>[[File:2.3 Location 1 report over time.png|center|600px]]</td> | ||
Line 102: | Line 103: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><b> 3.1 Change in conditions over time </b> | <td><b> 3.1 Change in conditions over time </b> | ||
− | <br>Similar to 2.3, each location is analysed individually where the dot represent each report received. From 6 April to 11 April, the uncertainty seems to be lesser on 8 and 9 April across all locations. The number of reports on these dates are a lot higher than the other dates. This is most probably when the major earthquake hits the cities in St. Himark. On 10th and 11th April, most cities have reports where the extent of damage are scattered around. | + | <br>Similar to 2.3, each location is analysed individually where the dot represent each report received. |
+ | |||
+ | After looking through each location, the damage reports seem to suggest a small earthquake on 6th April and a major earthquake on 8 and 9 April. On 8 and 9 April, there is a surge in number of reports across all locations. While | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | From 6 April to 11 April, the uncertainty seems to be lesser on 8 and 9 April across all locations. The number of reports on these dates are a lot higher than the other dates. This is most probably when the major earthquake hits the cities in St. Himark. On 10th and 11th April, most cities have reports where the extent of damage are scattered around. | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
<td>[[File:3.1 Location report over time.png|center|600px]]</td> | <td>[[File:3.1 Location report over time.png|center|600px]]</td> | ||
</table> | </table> |
Revision as of 19:28, 13 October 2019
|
|
|
|
Task 1: Analyse how neighborhoods should be prioritsed for response and find out which parts of the city are hardest hit
Insights | Visualization |
---|---|
1.1 Analysis of damage reports by time and average damage on location
|
|
1.2 Analysis of damage reports by average damage of objects
|
|
1.3 Analysis of Location with the hardest hit
In this analysis, shake intensity is removed as we are focusing on the damage done to the cities. Based on the average damage of all the damage reports, we can see that location 7 has the highest average damage. However when looked in location 7, the root cause of the high average damage comes from the damage on the power. On the other hand, looking at location 8, which has the next highest damage, damages are inflicted on almost all infrastructures and facilities. Although location 7 has highest damaged on its power, the situation is probably not as critical as locations with damages on its infrastructures and facilities which can results in loss of lives. |
Task 2: Use visual analytics to show uncertainty in the data, compare the reliability of neighborhood reports and find out which neighborhoods are providing reliable reports.
In order to analyse the reliability of the report, a comparison with the earthquake shake map is done. Since the earthquake shake map on 6 April 2020 and 8 April 2020 are given, only damage reports in these 2 days will be looked into.
Insights | Visualization |
---|---|
2.1 Comparison of damage reports on 6 April 2020
|
|
2.2 Comparison of damage reports on 8 April 2020
|
In order to analyse the uncertainty of the report, each location is looked into to see if reports are consistent in the extent of damage and shake intensity.
Insights | Visualization |
---|---|
2.3 Looking at the reports in each location
|
Task 3: Examine how the conditions, uncertainty in and key changes have changed over time
How do conditions change over time? How does uncertainty in change over time? Describe the key changes you see. Limit your response to 500 words and 8 images.
Insights | Visualization |
---|---|
3.1 Change in conditions over time
After looking through each location, the damage reports seem to suggest a small earthquake on 6th April and a major earthquake on 8 and 9 April. On 8 and 9 April, there is a surge in number of reports across all locations. While
From 6 April to 11 April, the uncertainty seems to be lesser on 8 and 9 April across all locations. The number of reports on these dates are a lot higher than the other dates. This is most probably when the major earthquake hits the cities in St. Himark. On 10th and 11th April, most cities have reports where the extent of damage are scattered around. |