Difference between revisions of "IS428 AY2019-20T1 Assign Wendy Ng Sock Ling Dashboard Design"
Wendyng.2015 (talk | contribs) |
Wendyng.2015 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><b> 4. Comparison of damage reports and earthquake shake map </b> | <td><b> 4. Comparison of damage reports and earthquake shake map </b> | ||
− | <br> The objective of this dashboard is to analyse the reliability of the damage reports with the results from the earthquake shake map assuming that the earthquake shake is accurate. | + | <br> The objective of this dashboard is to analyse the reliability of the damage reports with the results from the earthquake shake map assuming that the earthquake shake is accurate. As there are only 2 earthquake shake map provided which are on 6 April 2020 and 8 April 2020, |
</td> | </td> | ||
<td>[[File:WN_comparison of damage reports and earthquake shake map.png|center|600px]]</td> | <td>[[File:WN_comparison of damage reports and earthquake shake map.png|center|600px]]</td> | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td><b> 5. Reports by location over time </b> | <td><b> 5. Reports by location over time </b> | ||
− | <br> The objective of this dashboard is to | + | <br> The objective of this dashboard is to analyse the uncertainty of the damage reports by the locations. |
</td> | </td> | ||
<td>[[File:WN_Reports by location over time.png|center|600px]]</td> | <td>[[File:WN_Reports by location over time.png|center|600px]]</td> | ||
</table> | </table> |
Revision as of 12:24, 13 October 2019
|
|
|
|
Description | Visualization |
---|---|
1. Background and Navigation
|
|
2. Which neighbourhoods should be prioritised?
The bar chart in the middle shows the average extent of damage of all reports at the time selected for each location respectively. By selecting the location, the breakdown of the damage which can be seen on the right (empty if no location is selected). The location selected will be highlighted while all other locations are at the background in order to allow comparison of the damage by the facilities/ infrastructures. By hovering over circles that are not highlighted, the location can be viewed so as to enable responders to know which location is more damaged for the respective facility/infrastructure. For instance, in this picture the date and time "6/4/2020 12:00:00 AM" and location "2" are selected. As seen in the breakdown, although location 2 has the lowest average damage based on the bar chart, it has the highest damage on power. Hence, the responders might consider sending St. Himark's power department to location 2. |
|
3. Location with hardest hit
By clicking on an individual location, users can see the treemap with each box as the timestamp, the number of records as the size and the colour as the intensity of the damage. The colour changes from blue to red as the intensity increases. The user can also see the breakdown of the damage by the facility/ infrastructure. This enables user to make a decision on whether the damage has more consequences for the location or it might just be a small damage. For instance, the location 7 is selected in the picture. Although 7 has the highest average damage based on the reports, the root cause is the damage to the power. Other locations could have damage to buildings or roads which have worse consequences as it might costs losses of lives as compared to damages on power. |
|
4. Comparison of damage reports and earthquake shake map
|
|
5. Reports by location over time
|