Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Fu Chuanjie"

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #000000; background:#ABB7D0; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #000000; background:#ABB7D0; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
;
 
;
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_FU_CHUANJIE|<b><font size="4"><font color="#42485D">Background</font></font></b>]]
+
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_FU_CHUANJIE|<b><font size="4"><font color="#93e0a8">Background</font></font></b>]]
  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#ABB7D0; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#ABB7D0; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  

Revision as of 21:31, 2 July 2018

Ind-Logo.png VAST Challenge 2018: Like a Duck to Water

Background

Methodology & Dashboard Design

Insights

Conclusion

 


Uncovering evidence with water studies

Kasios’ spokespersons have denied any accusation of industrial waste dumping. They have emphasized that there is no ground contamination near the remote ranger station as suggested by last year’s challenge. Ornithologists from Mistford College have tried to take soil samples from the site to prove the existence of ground contamination. However, they have found that new top soil has been used to cover the site rendering any soil sampling approach useless. Without soil sampling, these ornithologists have instead turned to water sensor readings in the hope of proving contamination.