IS480 Team wiki: 2013T2 OneRevolution ProjectDocumentation UT1MajorFindingsandChanges
Main Wiki | Summary | Responses | Major Findings & Changes |
Contents
- 1 Major Finding 1: Unclear "Plan" Button
- 2 Changes for Major Finding 1
- 3 Major Finding 2: Unclear Lane Table
- 4 Changes for Major Finding 2
- 5 Major Finding 3: Misleading Checkbox
- 6 Changes for Major Finding 3
- 7 Major Finding 4: Too many fields to be filled manually (including the value 0)
- 8 Changes for Major Finding 4
Major Finding 1: Unclear "Plan" Button
The "plan" button at the home page was not obvious when testers tried to create a scenario.
Changes for Major Finding 1
Rename the “plan” to “create scenario” button at the navigation bar.
Before:
After:
Major Finding 2: Unclear Lane Table
The “lane table” tab was not obvious when testers tried to edit lane information.
Changes for Major Finding 2
Rename the “lane table” to “lane management” button at the right panel
Before:
After:
Major Finding 3: Misleading Checkbox
Observation: The checkbox in the scenario management was meant for analysis for multiple scenario. However, testers tend to click on it when testing on functions like “delete” scenario.
Changes for Major Finding 3
Created a new tab, “analyze scenario”. Remove it from Scenario Management page.
Before:
After:
Major Finding 4: Too many fields to be filled manually (including the value 0)
When tester creates a lane, they are irritated by having to fill in a 0 for the different transport percentages.
Changes for Major Finding 4
Pre-populate 0 in lane form as it caused an unnecessary error.
Before:
After: