Difference between revisions of "Team Accuro Project Management"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| | + | | style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background: #efefef;" colspan="16"| Step 2: Feature Extraction |
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Model Development | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 201: | Line 203: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | | | + | | |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | + | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Model Evaluation | |
| − | + | | | |
| − | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Model | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 217: | Line 218: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| + | | | ||
| | | | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Factor Interpretation | ||
| | | | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| − | |||
| style="background: #B22222;" | | | style="background: #B22222;" | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 236: | Line 236: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| | + | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Spatial autocorrelation assessment |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 298: | Line 298: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background: #efefef;" colspan="16"| Step 3: | + | | style="font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; background: #efefef;" colspan="16"| Step 3: Spatial Lag Analysis |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| | + | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Spatial lag model development |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 315: | Line 315: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| | + | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Alternative model development and testing |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| | + | | style="font-family:Helvetica Neue;"| Salient region interpretation |
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 01:22, 28 September 2015
Timeline
| Task | W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 | W5 | W6 | W7 | W8 | W9 | W10 | W11 | W12 | W13 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research | |||||||||||||||
| Project Scope Exploration | |||||||||||||||
| Tools Familiarity | |||||||||||||||
| Exploratory Data Analysis | |||||||||||||||
| Proposal Development | |||||||||||||||
| Project Proposal | |||||||||||||||
| Proposal Document | |||||||||||||||
| Wiki Page | |||||||||||||||
| Step 1: Descriptive Analysis | |||||||||||||||
| Data Preparation | |||||||||||||||
| Advanced Data Exploration | |||||||||||||||
| Clustering Business Profiles | |||||||||||||||
| Step 2: Feature Extraction | |||||||||||||||
| Model Development | |||||||||||||||
| Model Evaluation | |||||||||||||||
| Factor Interpretation | |||||||||||||||
| Spatial autocorrelation assessment | |||||||||||||||
| Midterm Report | |||||||||||||||
| Interim Report Preparation | |||||||||||||||
| Interim Presentation Preparation | |||||||||||||||
| Wiki Update | |||||||||||||||
| Step 3: Spatial Lag Analysis | |||||||||||||||
| Spatial lag model development | |||||||||||||||
| Alternative model development and testing | |||||||||||||||
| Salient region interpretation | |||||||||||||||
| Step 4: Data Visualization | |||||||||||||||
| Tool Development | |||||||||||||||
| User Testing | |||||||||||||||
| UI Improvement | |||||||||||||||
| Final Presentation | |||||||||||||||
| Final Report | |||||||||||||||
| Final Presentation | |||||||||||||||
| Wiki update | |||||||||||||||
| Poster | |||||||||||||||
Risk Assessment
| Impact | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Medium | High | ||
| Likelihood | Low | Low | Low | Moderate |
| Medium | Low | Moderate | High | |
| High | Moderate | High | High | |
| Risks | Level | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Insufficient statistical knowledge | Medium | Consult with supervisor and online course materials |
| Lack of actionable business insights | High | Continuous literature search on meaningfulness of insights for businesses according to each city |
| Dashboard UI design may not be intuitive or extensive | High | User testing and consistent updates with the supervisor |
