Difference between revisions of "Network Analysis of Interlocking Directorates/Project Overview"

From Analytics Practicum
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(first created)
 
(add content)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
<font face="Constansia" size=2% align:center>
 
<font face="Constansia" size=2% align:center>
 
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Project Description</font></div>
 
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Project Description</font></div>
 +
<font size=3px>
 +
Our project aims to review and analyse the interlocking directorates among corporate organizations in Singapore. While interlocking directorates is lawful and has its advantages, it may give rise to conflicts of interests and unfair advantages especially if the relationship is between public and private organizations.
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
 +
Using corporates and directorships database from OneSource, we will analyze the network of interlocking directorates amongst Singapore firms. Through our analysis, readers will be able to identify possible areas where conflicts of interest may arise between public and private organizations. They will also be able to observe patterns of interdependency between sectors in Singapore which might assist them in making better business decisions. 
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
 +
<br/>
 +
</font>
 +
 
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Our Motivation</font></div>
 
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Our Motivation</font></div>
−
Like Hong Kong, Singapore is a country with scarce natural resources that many companies are fighting for. As the Government holds the key to many resources such as land and other sensitive information, the success of a business can be greatly affected depending on whether it gains access to these information. Ever since the AIM scandal in 2012, Singaporeans have been questioning the transparency of the government and if some companies have an unfair advantage over others.
+
<font size=3px>
−
 
+
Since the latest Singapore General Elections in 2011, there has been renewed interest in the way the the Government of Singapore operates. The transparency of the government has also been called into question due to the AIM scandal in 2012. Because members of public organizations are allowed to act in multiple board of directors for private corporates, it is questioned whether it is fair for economic development and competition, as these members have higher control over political and economic resources. Our team is interested in looking deeply into the interlocking directorates to clarify the issue and to see how impactful and profitable the network of corporate interlocks has.  
−
This project aims to tackle the issue by analyzing board-of-directors (BOD) information through networks analytics to investigate the possible existence of conflicts of interests between public and private bodies in Singapore. Using the same information, our team will also attempt to determine the relationships between each sector by analyzing the pattern of interlocking directorates among the various sectors in Singapore.
+
<br/>
 +
<br/>
 +
</font>
  
 
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Project Scope</font></div>
 
<div style="font-size: 16px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Project Scope</font></div>
−
In each firm, there may be a board of directors which contains both insiders, who are direct employee under the firm, and outsiders – people who are not employees of the firm but hold an important position in the board of directors. As the existence of interlocking directorates between public and private entities in the same sector increases the possibility of conflicts of interest, our team aims to produce a visualization of these relationships between public and private companies. Key features of our project will include:
+
<font size=3px>
−
 
+
In each firm, there may be a board of directors which contains both insiders, who are direct employee under the firm, and outsiders – people who are not employees of the firm but hold an important position in the board of directors. As the existence of interlocking directorates between public and private entities in the same sector increases the possibility of conflicts of interest, our team aims to produce a visualization of these relationships. Key features of our project includes:
−
# 1. Identifying possible areas where conflicts of interests might arise
+
#1. Visualization of the network of interlocking directorates
−
# 2. Understanding influencers within sectors
+
#2. Analysis of this network, focusing on the relationships from public to private sectors.
−
# 3. Identify the interdependence among various sectors
+
#3. Gathering useful insights from the analysis, which may be helpful the corporate leaders in decision-making in the future.
−
 
 
 
</font>
 
</font>
 
<!--End Body-->
 
<!--End Body-->

Revision as of 20:49, 23 January 2015

Home Project Overview Findings & Insights Project Management Project Documentation Learning Outcomes


Project Description

Our project aims to review and analyse the interlocking directorates among corporate organizations in Singapore. While interlocking directorates is lawful and has its advantages, it may give rise to conflicts of interests and unfair advantages especially if the relationship is between public and private organizations.
Using corporates and directorships database from OneSource, we will analyze the network of interlocking directorates amongst Singapore firms. Through our analysis, readers will be able to identify possible areas where conflicts of interest may arise between public and private organizations. They will also be able to observe patterns of interdependency between sectors in Singapore which might assist them in making better business decisions.

Our Motivation

Since the latest Singapore General Elections in 2011, there has been renewed interest in the way the the Government of Singapore operates. The transparency of the government has also been called into question due to the AIM scandal in 2012. Because members of public organizations are allowed to act in multiple board of directors for private corporates, it is questioned whether it is fair for economic development and competition, as these members have higher control over political and economic resources. Our team is interested in looking deeply into the interlocking directorates to clarify the issue and to see how impactful and profitable the network of corporate interlocks has.

Project Scope

In each firm, there may be a board of directors which contains both insiders, who are direct employee under the firm, and outsiders – people who are not employees of the firm but hold an important position in the board of directors. As the existence of interlocking directorates between public and private entities in the same sector increases the possibility of conflicts of interest, our team aims to produce a visualization of these relationships. Key features of our project includes:

  1. 1. Visualization of the network of interlocking directorates
  2. 2. Analysis of this network, focusing on the relationships from public to private sectors.
  3. 3. Gathering useful insights from the analysis, which may be helpful the corporate leaders in decision-making in the future.

Retrieved from ‘https://wiki.smu.edu.sg/ANLY482/index.php?title=Network_Analysis_of_Interlocking_Directorates/Project_Overview&oldid=1242’