From Geospatial Analytics for Urban Planning
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| AHP Fundamental Scale (Row vs Column)
|
| Extremely Less Important
|
1/9
|
|
|
1/8
|
| Very Strongly Less Important
|
1/7
|
|
|
1/6
|
| Strongly Less Important
|
1/5
|
|
|
1/4
|
| Moderately Less Important
|
1/3
|
|
|
1/2
|
| Equal Importance
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
| Moderately More Important
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
| Strongly More Important
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
| Very Strongly More Important
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
| Extremely More Important
|
9
|
| Factor Priorities for Communicable Disease Quarantine Centre in Gombak - Pairwise Comparison Matrix
|
| Row vs. Column
|
Economic Factor
|
Accessibility Factor
|
Health Risk Factor
|
Natural Conservation Factor
|
| Economic Factor
|
1
|
1/7
|
1/9
|
1/3
|
| Accessibility Factor
|
7
|
1
|
1
|
3
|
| Health Risk Factor
|
9
|
1
|
1
|
7
|
| Natural Conservation Factor
|
3
|
1/3
|
1/7
|
1
|
| Column Totals
|
20.00
|
2.48
|
2.25
|
11.33
|
| Legend
|
| Automatic Calculation by Matrix
|
Red
|
| Self-Input into Matrix
|
Yellow
|
| Normalised Column Weights
|
| Row vs. Column
|
Economic Factor
|
Accessibility Factor
|
Health Risk Factor
|
Natural Conservation Factor
|
AHP-1(%)
|
| Economic Factor
|
0.05
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
0.03
|
4.7
|
| Accessibility Factor
|
0.35
|
0.40
|
0.44
|
0.26
|
36.6
|
| Health Risk Factor
|
0.45
|
0.40
|
0.44
|
0.62
|
47.9
|
| Natural Conservation Factor
|
0.15
|
0.13
|
0.06
|
0.09
|
10.9
|
