IS428 AY2019-20T1 Assign Chew Hui Ling Conclusion

From Visual Analytics for Business Intelligence
Revision as of 23:33, 14 October 2019 by Hlchew.2017 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div style=background:#D3D3D3 border:#696969> 165px <b><font size = 6; color="#8B4513">   VAST Challenge 2019 MC 1: Crowdsourcing for Situational Aw...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MC1-2019.jpg   VAST Challenge 2019 MC 1: Crowdsourcing for Situational Awareness

Background

Data Analysis and Preparation

Visualization

Insights

Conclusion

 


Conclusion

  • Based on the data we have, we can conclude that either 6 or 7 is prequake and 8 and 9 is majorquake. This is due to the high intensity of the shake as well as the damages.
  • I realised that the images given for both prequake and majorquake is accurate except for the two location that are the outliers which is Broadview and Scenic Vista


References
[1] [2]

[3]

  1. ↑ https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/changing-views-using-parameters.htm
  2. ↑ https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/parameters_swap.htm
  3. ↑ https://www.rhinobldg.com/how-we-measure-earthquakes/
Retrieved from ‘https://wiki.smu.edu.sg/1920t1is428g1/index.php?title=IS428_AY2019-20T1_Assign_Chew_Hui_Ling_Conclusion&oldid=7011’