Difference between revisions of "IS428 AY2019-20T1 Assign Chew Hui Ling Conclusion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hlchew.2017 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div style=background:#D3D3D3 border:#696969> 165px <b><font size = 6; color="#8B4513"> VAST Challenge 2019 MC 1: Crowdsourcing for Situational Aw...") |
Hlchew.2017 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
<font size="5"><font color="#8B4513">'''References'''</font></font> | <font size="5"><font color="#8B4513">'''References'''</font></font> | ||
<br/> | <br/> | ||
− | + | # https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/changing-views-using-parameters.htm | |
− | + | # https://help.tableau.com/current/pro/desktop/en-us/parameters_swap.htm | |
− | + | # https://www.rhinobldg.com/how-we-measure-earthquakes/ |
Latest revision as of 23:34, 14 October 2019
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
- Based on the data we have, we can conclude that either 6 or 7 is prequake and 8 and 9 is majorquake. This is due to the high intensity of the shake as well as the damages.
- I realised that the images given for both prequake and majorquake is accurate except for the two location that are the outliers which is Broadview and Scenic Vista
References