ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Xie Zhimao Conclusion
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
- 1. Compare with the measure performances for past and recent years, we found total volume has been controlled. But when we dig into specific location's volume, we find some locations increase and the others decease. So the Kasios Furniture Company is still damaging the environment all the time. It just changed the places to let out the chemical contaminations. Somchair and Busarakhan would on the top of lists to be investigated.
- 2. We argue the Hydrology Department collected insufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve.
- To begin with, two locations are taken into measured since 2009, theier data can not be consistent with other places.
- In addition, the the Hydrology Department provides too many measures for us. It's hard to decide the best indicators for the water quality change. Pick out the large values indicators would be a good choice, such as Total dissolved salts, Total hardness, Bicarbonates.
- Finally, we need to pay more attention to the integrity of crucial indicators since they representitive for overall water quality change.
- 3. We have to admited some serious measures are reduced in recents years. But there are some measures are still increasing like Total Hardness and Bicarbonates. What's more, the number of Macrobenthos is drastically reduced. Macrobenthos consists of the organisms that live at the bottom of a water column and are visible to the naked eye. If they disappear in the water, in must cause damage to the local biological chain and threaten existence of the Pipit or other wildlife.