Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2017T2 Mavericks User Testing 4"

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 91: Line 91:
==User Ratings:==  
==User Ratings:==  
[[Image:MV-UT3-userrating.png|center|700px]]<br />
[[File:UT4 User Feedbacks.PNG|center|700px]]<br />
'''Average Ease of Use Rating:''' 3.5/5<br>
'''Average Ease of Use Rating:''' 4.06/5<br>
'''Average Overall UI Design Rating:''' 3.8/5<br>
'''Average Overall UI Design Rating:''' 4.03/5<br>
'''Average Effectiveness as a Learning Tool Rating:''' 3.7/5<br>
'''Average Effectiveness as a Learning Tool Rating:''' 4.0/5<br>
==Feedback From Users==
==Feedback From Users==

Revision as of 21:45, 3 April 2018


MV-home.png   HOME


MV-logo.png   ABOUT US


MV-overview.png   PROJECT OVERVIEW




MV-documentation.png   DOCUMENTATION

Personas & Scenarios


Meeting Minutes

Proof of Deployment

User Testing

Project Deliverables


View UT1 Results

View UT2 Results

View UT3 Results

View UT4 Results

User Testing 4's Test Overview

Date: 21 March 2018
Duration: 1830 – 2000
Venue: SOE CR B1-4
Participants: 35 students from SMU
Scope: Application consisting of 8 core features

  1. Login and OTP Verification
  2. Complete Pre-Quiz
  3. Check Account Balance
  4. Add Beneficiary
  5. Transfer Funds
  6. View Aggregated Expenses
  7. Viewing of Scoreboard
  8. Complete Post-Quiz

Objective: To gain feedback/user perspectives on usability of completed functionalities - especially on the educational module and speech-to-text feature, which are some of our core functions.

Overview of Tasks' Results:

UT4 Overview of Tasks' Results.PNG

User Ratings:

UT4 User Feedbacks.PNG

Average Ease of Use Rating: 4.06/5
Average Overall UI Design Rating: 4.03/5
Average Effectiveness as a Learning Tool Rating: 4.0/5

Feedback From Users

  1. 40% of users listed "Chatbot" as their top favourite feature, with reasons such as "convenient" and "interactive"
  2. 30% of users listed "Admin Live Support" as their top favourite feature, with the main reason being it offers additional help which the chatbot cannot offer
  3. "Lack of instructions/unclear guide on how to use the application" was a common feedback among participants. Users were unable to understand what the features it offers

Comments on areas for improvement

  1. Live support can be a button instead
  2. More colours to the UI
  3. Help/FAQ function to assist participants
  4. Clearer guide/instructions on how to use the application
  5. Clearer guide/instructions to show users the features offered on the platform