HeaderSIS.jpg

IS480 Team wiki: 2016T1 ByteMe User Testing

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
ByteMe Logo.jpeg
ByteMe Home icon 2.png
ByteMe About me icon 2.png
ByteMe overview icon 2.png
Management icon.png
ByteMe Documentation icon 2.png
ByteMe Project Documentation.png
Technical Documents Design & UI/UX Process Flows Meeting Minutes User Testings
User Test 1

Test Plan (Admin)

Number of Users: 4
Date: 4th August 2016 & 5th August 2016
Venue: Benjamin Gan Office (SMU SIS 5034) & Fiona Lee's Office (SMU SIS 4056)
Duration: 30 mins per user
Objectives:

  • Analysing the usability of the Application (User Interface, Navigation Ease, etc.)
  • Identify any bugs or issues that users may face during the user testing.
  • Improving the IS480 application based on the user testing result.
  • Identify any other functions that the course coordinators of IS480 may find useful.

Scope:

  • Create Term
  • Create/Edit Milestones in Terms
  • Export Student-Team.csv

Procedure: Users are given a document which contains information on how to go about with the user testing.

Results & Comments

  • The System still contains bugs that our team did not successfully fix.
  • User Interface is good, but some parts be improved on. Ideas and suggestions were given.

Action Plan

  • Front-end development fixes were given to Michael.
  • Bugs were recorded and the team would fix the bugs accordingly.
  • The term function would have to be re-done.


Test Plan (Student)

Number of Users: 7
Date: 6th August 2016 & 7th August 2016
Venue: SMU School of Information Systems
Duration: Around 30 mins per user
Objectives:

  • Observation of user behavior when using our application
  • Identify usability issues that exist in the application
  • Improve our application based on user testing result

Scope:

  • SSO Login using your SMU Account details
  • Edit their Student Details
  • Create/Join Team
  • Request to take up a Project

Procedure: Users are given a document which contains information on how to go about with the user testing.

Results & Comments

  • There were some bugs in the system, but none serious.
  • User Interface is good, but some parts be improved on. Ideas and suggestions were given.

Action Plan

  • Bugs were recorded and the team would fix the bugs accordingly.