HeaderSIS.jpg

Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2013T2 DR.Jean Labs The Team Final Quality of the Product"

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 166: Line 166:
 
| align="center"| 20-Feb-14 to 23-Feb-14
 
| align="center"| 20-Feb-14 to 23-Feb-14
 
|| For more information, please click[[IS480 Team wiki: 2013T2 DR.Jean Labs UT3|<b> here </b>]]
 
|| For more information, please click[[IS480 Team wiki: 2013T2 DR.Jean Labs UT3|<b> here </b>]]
 +
| align="center"| 15
 +
| align="center" width = "5%"| 20 - 27
 +
|-
 +
 +
| align="center"| User Test 4 (Adv)
 +
| align="center"| 3-Mar-14 to 7-Mar-14
 +
|| For more information, please click[[IS480 Team wiki: 2013T2 DR.Jean Labs UT4|<b> here </b>]]
 
| align="center"| 15
 
| align="center"| 15
 
| align="center" width = "5%"| 20 - 27
 
| align="center" width = "5%"| 20 - 27

Revision as of 18:17, 21 April 2014

Agurz avatar.png
Denise avatar.png
Eleazar avatar.png
Dr.jeanlabs logo.jpg
Janan avatar.png
Nicholas avatar.png
Rafael avatar.png

HOME

 

DR.JEAN LABS

 

PROJECT OVERVIEW

 

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

 

PROJECT DOCUMENTATION

 


{ In a nutshell } { Acceptance Wiki } { MidTerm Wiki } { Final Wiki }



<< Project Summary >> << Project Management >> << Quality of the Product >> << Our Reflections >>

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Quality of the project

Intermediate Deliverables:

Stage Specification Modules
Project Management Lab Minutes Lab Minutes
Supervisor Minutes Supervisor Minutes
Mentor Minutes Mentor Minutes
Schedule Metrics Schedule Metrics
Bug/Risk/Well-Being Metrics Metrics
Requirements Prototype Low-Fi Prototype
Analysis & Design Use case Use Case Diagrams
Flow Diagram Flow Diagram
System Architecture Diagram System Architecture diagram
User test plan User Tests
Handover Test Test

User Testing:

User Test Date of Test Objectives Number of participants Age range
Heuristic Evaluation 19-Oct-13 It is a way to highlight usability issues in our paper prototype. We followed the Ten Usability Heuristics reading by Jakob Nielsen. Using these, evaluators will list as many usability issues as possible. It is able to help us to identify problems and decide how we can solve it. For detailed and concise description to the usability problem and solution, please see our Heuristic Evaluation findings 4 23 - 26
User Test 1 (Advertiser) 27-Jan-14 to 29-Jan-14 It is to look at the general usability of Sqkii's advertiser platform whether

1. How easy is it for new advertiser to learn how to use our web application?
2. Can we minimize the number of clicks for tasks?
3. Navigability model - Does it make sense for the flow of creating a squib?
For more information, please click here

5 23 - 60
User Test 2 (User) 10-Feb-14 to 12-Feb-14 For more information, please click here 10 17 - 24
User Test 3 (User) 20-Feb-14 to 23-Feb-14 For more information, please click here 15 20 - 27
User Test 4 (Adv) 3-Mar-14 to 7-Mar-14 For more information, please click here 15 20 - 27


Summary of the user test.

  • A total of 3 user tests has been conducted for both advertiser and user. This is to ensure at we meet the real need of advertiser and value add to users.
  • Enable us to build a more user-friendly application that meets the need of advertiser. It is not to convert sales, but to create more eye-balls to their promotion.
  • It is value adding to the user's live. MOre useful content was exposed to the user to create more awareness of the promotion and could potentially be their customer.
  • Unexpected event occur such in bugs during Closed Beta Launch. However, the team was able to resolve it within a reasonably fast response time, thus delayed some of the functions in Sprint 7. Please see Metric for more details.
  • We also faced one hacker that tried to inject codes into our system too! With our fast and quick response time, we manage to spot the outlier and manage to do mitigations and prevent the hacker to further hack our system.
  • User Test results were generally very positive with general comments such as "Interesting Concept!", "Nice and pleasing user interface.", "Cool application".