Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki:2017T2 Zenith Midterm Wiki"
|Line 44:||Line 44:|
===Deployed site link===
===Deployed site link===
Revision as of 00:46, 16 February 2018
|Midterm Wiki||Final Wiki|
- 1 Project Progress Summary
- 2 Project Management
- 3 Quality of product
- 4 Reflection
Project Progress Summary
(insert link here)
Our project schedule is divided into 13 iterations.
- We are currently on our 9th iteration.
- Up till (date), we have completed (percentage)% of our development progress.
- 1 User Acceptance Test was conducted before Midterms. The results are shown here.
- New team of clients
- Changing of roles within our team
- List of requirement changes can be viewed here.
Project Schedule (Plan Vs Actual):
|Planned (Acceptance)||Actual (Midterms)|
- Removal of UAT 1 at client's request. Client is unable to get NUS medical students for the user testing as it coincides with their exam period.
View our detailed schedule here!
Summary of analysis for the metrics collected. You may refer to another page for the details about the metrics and how it is collected.
Update the proposal assumptions and risks. Describe what you learn from the risk update and mitigation steps taken.
Be sure to prioritize the risks.
Natural Language Processing
Natural Language Processing (NLP) was used for the automated marking of open-ended questions.
Added security features
In December 2017, our MongoDB database was compromised and held hostage by ransomware. We were instructed to pay 0.1 bitcoin (USD $1594) for the return of our data. Fortunately, we had backed up the data so there was no need for us to pay the ransom. Since this incident, we have taken additional measures to ensure that this does not happen again.
Quality of product
Provide more details about the quality of your work. For example, you designed a flexible configurable system using XML.config files, uses Strategy Design Pattern to allow plugging in different strategy, implement a regular expression parser to map a flexible formula editor, etc.
There should be some evidence of work in progress.
Not all parts of the deliverables are necessary but the evidence should be convincing of the progress. Try to include design deliverables that shows the quality of your project.
In an iterative approach, ready to use system should be available (deployed) for client and instructions to access the system described here (user name). If necessary, provide a deployment diagram link.
Describe the testing done on your system. For example, the number of user testing, tester profile, test cases, survey results, issue tracker, bug reports, etc.
In this section, describe what have the team learn? Be brief. Sometimes, the client writes a report to feedback on the system; this sponsor report can be included or linked from here.
Any training and lesson learn? What are the take-away so far? It would be very convincing if the knowledge is share at the wiki knowledge base and linked here.
Benjamin Gan Reflection:
You may include individual reflection if that make sense at this point. The team is uncooperative and did not follow my instructions.