HeaderSIS.jpg

Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki:2017T2 Zenith FinalWiki"

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 245: Line 245:
 
<div style="font-family: Verdana;">
 
<div style="font-family: Verdana;">
 
Our technical complexity comprises of:  
 
Our technical complexity comprises of:  
* Use of Natural Language Processing to mark open-ended questions.  
+
* Use of Natural Language Processing to mark open-ended questions. [[IS480 Team wiki:2017T2 Zenith Midterm Wiki#Natural Language Processing|(Discussed here during Midterms) ]]
* Development of game for students, including anti-cheating mechanisms.  
+
* Development of game for students, including anti-cheating mechanisms. [[IS480 Team wiki:2017T2 Zenith Midterm Wiki#Game development|(Discussed here during Midterms)]]
* Security features: firewall, automated backup for database, HTTPS protocol, SSH tunnel, and encryption of environment variables.  
+
* Security features: firewall, automated backup for database, HTTPS protocol, SSH tunnel, and encryption of environment variables. [[IS480 Team wiki:2017T2 Zenith Midterm Wiki#Added security features|(Discussed here during Midterms)]]  
 
+
* Analyics dashboards for Students, Professors and Admins.
[[IS480 Team wiki:2017T2 Zenith Midterm Wiki#Natural Language Processing| here]]
+
* Recommendation Models for Students and Professors.
 
 
 
</div>  
 
</div>  
  
 +
====Analytics Dashboards====
 +
<div style="font-family: Verdana;">
 +
Coming Soon :)
 +
</div>
  
 
+
====Recommendation Models ====
====Recommendation Models for students and Professors ====
 
 
<div style="font-family: Verdana;">
 
<div style="font-family: Verdana;">
 
Coming Soon :)
 
Coming Soon :)

Revision as of 21:05, 3 April 2018

Zenith banner.png

Home

Team

Project Overview

Project Management

Documentation

Main Wiki

Midterm Wiki Final Wiki


Zenith final header.PNG


Project Progress Summary

Finals Slides

Zenith Finals Slides

Deployed site link

Zenith deployment link.jpeg

Project Highlights

Our project schedule is divided into 13 iterations.

  • We are currently on our 12th iteration (26 Mar - 8 Apr 2018).
  • Up till 3 Apr 2018, we have completed 94% of our development progress.
  • 2 User Acceptance Tests were conducted before the Final Presentation. The results are shown here.
  • Achieved and exceeded Midterms X-factor. <<update after UAT>>


Unexpected events:

  • List of requirement changes after Midterms can be viewed here.

Project Management

Iteration Progress: 12 of 13
Features Completion: 94% (43 out of 46 features)
Confidence Level: 100%

Project Status:

A breakdown of tasks is shown in our project scope.


Zenith final scope.JPG


Note: will be updated after our last UAT.


Project Schedule (Plan Vs Actual):

Milestones Overview:

Planned (Acceptance) Actual (Midterms)

Zenith midterm actual timeline.png

Zenith final actual timeline.png

Project Schedule:

Planned Schedule (Midterm)

Zenith final expected schedule.png



Changes in planned schedule (Midterm)

Zenith final changed schedule.png



Actual Schedule (Final)

Zenith final actual schedule.png

Project Metrics:

Task metric

Zenith task metric.png
Score TM <= 50 50 < TM <= 75 75 < TM <= 125 125 < TM <= 150 150 > TM
Action 1. Inform supervisor within 24 hours.
2. Re-estimate tasks for future iterations.
3. Consider dropping Tasks.
1. Re-estimate tasks for future iterations.
2. Deduct number of days behind from buffer days.
3. If there are no more buffer days, decide the functionalities to drop.
1. Our estimates are fairly accurate, and are roughly on track.
2. Add/deduct number of days ahead / behind from buffer days.
1. Re-estimate tasks for future iterations.
2. Add number of days ahead to buffer days.
1. Inform supervisor within 24 hours.
2. Re-estimate tasks for future iterations.

Bug metric

Zenith bug count.png

Zenith bug score.png

Note: There were no coding tasks for iteration 1.


Severity Low Impact High Impact Critical Impact
Description User interface display errors, such as out of alignment, colour used is not according to theme.

It does not affect the functionality of the system.

The system is functional with some non-critical functionalities are not working. The system is not functional.

Bugs have to be fixed before proceeding.


Points BM <= 5 5 < BM < 10 BM >= 10
Description The system does not need immediate fixing, could be fixed during buffer time or during coding sessions Coders to use planned debugging time in the iteration to solve the bug The team has to stop all current development and resolve the bug immediately



Project Risks:

Zenith risk metric.png
S/N Risk Type Description Likelihood Impact Level Threat Level Mitigation Plan
1 Technical Ransomware attacks on Database Low (but it happened) High B System Architect to improve database security
2 Organizational New members in NUS MedSense Team Medium Medium B Project Manager will be in constant communication with new members, and will regularly review the scope with them.
3 Project Management Members falling sick or going overseas doing school period, reducing team's available manpower. This can cause a potential delays in the project Medium Medium B Team members should constantly check on the health and well-being of one another, as well as update the Project Manager of any overseas plans as early as possible



Technical Complexity:

Our technical complexity comprises of:

Analytics Dashboards

Coming Soon :)

Recommendation Models

Coming Soon :)

Quality of product

Intermediate Deliverables:

Stage Specification
Project Management Schedule
Minutes
Bug metrics
Task metrics
Risk management
Change management
Requirements Overview
Scope
Personas
Analysis Use case diagram
Architecture diagram
Technologies used
Design Prototypes
Testing User Acceptance Test 1 (11 - 13 Feb 2018)
User Acceptance Test 2 (4 - 10 Apr 2018)

Testing:

  • Creation of test cases during development.
  • Functionality testing after completion of function.
  • Regression testing at the end of every iteration.
  • 2 UATs completed by Final Presentation.
  • 1 UAT has been completed after Midterms. To view the results of this UAT, click here.

Reflections

Team Reflection:

Our team has learnt the importance of working together closely with our clients, to ensure an ideal alignment between the client business requirements and our end-product. Throughout our development process, we are constantly plagued with minor hiccups and bugs. However, our team feels that our most valuable quality is resilience, as we tackle each and every problem with our ineffable tenacity and innovation.

Individual Reflections:

Amelia:

It has been a very experimental journey managing the team since the project started. New challenges are always popping up, and I have learnt to manage the workload of each member more carefully. I believe communication is today’s important skill, be it raising issues with the team or simple dissemination of information. That is why I ensure that there are no communication lapses in our team.

Chin Rui:

It has been a challenging 7 weeks since our acceptance. The application architecture has undergone multiple major changes, especially our security configrations, to ensure better quality and continuity for our clients. The security breach incident was an eye-opening experience for me, and I have learnt to never take security for granted. I have realised that security should be a key consideration when planning an application's architecture because every implementation or change made could introduce a new vulnerability for potential attackers to take advantage of. Aside from the security enhancements, I have also discovered the difficulties in planning a software architecture after taking into account of budget, skill and technical constrains.

Ervin:

Being the previous Business Analyst, it was an enriching and mind-boggling experience researching on various Natural Language Processing techniques and trying to appraise their adequacy and appropriateness for our application. Moving on as the Quality Assurance lead, I hope I do not offend everyone involved in development by scrutinizing every single corner case in the application.

Ming Rui:

The opportunity to be able to apply the entire design thinking process from the creation of prototypes to the actual web development have been arduous but rewarding journey. The final designs of the application are a product of multiple revamps, each better compared to the previous. I have learnt the importance of gathering feedback from the clients as well as real users.

Qimin:

Having to pick up Node.js and React.js in a short period of time really pushed me to learn and adapt at a much faster pace. There are many front-end and back-end considerations to factor in during the design process, such as the communication between parent-child components and the use of redux store versus a direct http request to the database. I believe that my technical skills have definitely improved over the past few weeks.

Ricky:

It has been a great experience seeing how the project has grown from infancy to where it is today. As a backend developer, I have realised that is important to have a seamless integration of the frontend components with the server side logic as well as designing and implementing data storage solutions. Throughout the past few months working on the project, I have learnt that what’s even more important than completing the work assigned to me is to help my team members with their tasks. This will enable smoother and faster progression as a team.