HeaderSIS.jpg

Difference between revisions of "Goodmix Final Wiki"

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == Project Progress Summary == == Project Management == == Quality of Product == == Reflection ==)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Project Progress Summary ==
  
== Project Progress Summary ==
+
This section is about sudden requirement changes or requests since midterm which we took up. More information on how requirement changes are handled here.
 +
 
 +
{|cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" align="center" text-align="center" style="font-size:100%; border: 2px solid darkgray;"
 +
|-
 +
! style="background:#FFF8C6;border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;width:30px;" align="center"|S/N
 +
! style="background:#FFF8C6;border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;width:200px;" align="center"|Event
 +
! style="background:#FFF8C6;border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;width:200px;" align="center"|Evaluation
 +
! style="background:#FFF8C6;border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;width:400px;" align="center"|Action
 +
! style="background:#FFF8C6;border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;width:200px;" align="center"|Result
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" align="center" | 1
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | User request customizing symbols by choosing from a list of images
 +
 
 +
| style=" border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | Impact: high as it affects many other functionality <p> Difficulty: high as no research about this is done before.
 +
 
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | Team consulted sponsor with the following options:
 +
 
 +
1. Implement change but outcome is not the responsibility of Goodmix
 +
 
 +
a. Might have major bugs that cannot be solved and have to revert
 +
 
 +
b. Less time to work on existing bugs but able to pass UAT
 +
 
 +
2. Do not implement change and focus on debugging
 +
 
 +
Sponsor chose option 1.
 +
 
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;" | Team split into coding team (Bernard, Shazlee and George) and project management team (Naresh and Jess) to work concurrently.
 +
 
 +
Scenario 1(b) occurred.
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" align="center" | 2
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | New “find coordinates” function requested on 8th November to be up by 10th November for UAT
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" |Impact: low because it is a standalone function
 +
Difficulty: low because similar techniques are used before
 +
 
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | Went ahead with the request but tight deadline is a challenge so collaboration is critical. Bernard had to finish the coding and UI before passing it to Naresh to update Test Plan and Shazlee to update User Guide.
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;" | Request completed and RIBA tested before UAT
 +
 
 +
|-
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" align="center" | 3
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | Client failed the spatial error handling for the UAT conducted on 10 November 2010. If this is not addressed, it means that the UAT failed.
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | Impact: low because it does not implicate other codes
 +
Difficulty: medium as previous attempts to give specific errors had failed.
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;border-right:1px solid darkgray;" | Team is offered 2 options from sponsor
 +
1.Fix it
 +
2.Not fix it and write a statement as explanations which will be submitted back to the client who graded fail for approval.
 +
| style="border-bottom:1px solid darkgray;" | Jess thought of an idea and managed to accomplish the specific error handling.
 +
 
 +
|}
  
 
== Project Management ==
 
== Project Management ==

Revision as of 21:52, 13 November 2010

Project Progress Summary

This section is about sudden requirement changes or requests since midterm which we took up. More information on how requirement changes are handled here.

S/N Event Evaluation Action Result
1 User request customizing symbols by choosing from a list of images Impact: high as it affects many other functionality

Difficulty: high as no research about this is done before.

Team consulted sponsor with the following options:

1. Implement change but outcome is not the responsibility of Goodmix

a. Might have major bugs that cannot be solved and have to revert

b. Less time to work on existing bugs but able to pass UAT

2. Do not implement change and focus on debugging

Sponsor chose option 1.

Team split into coding team (Bernard, Shazlee and George) and project management team (Naresh and Jess) to work concurrently.

Scenario 1(b) occurred.

2 New “find coordinates” function requested on 8th November to be up by 10th November for UAT Impact: low because it is a standalone function

Difficulty: low because similar techniques are used before

Went ahead with the request but tight deadline is a challenge so collaboration is critical. Bernard had to finish the coding and UI before passing it to Naresh to update Test Plan and Shazlee to update User Guide. Request completed and RIBA tested before UAT
3 Client failed the spatial error handling for the UAT conducted on 10 November 2010. If this is not addressed, it means that the UAT failed. Impact: low because it does not implicate other codes

Difficulty: medium as previous attempts to give specific errors had failed.

Team is offered 2 options from sponsor

1.Fix it 2.Not fix it and write a statement as explanations which will be submitted back to the client who graded fail for approval.

Jess thought of an idea and managed to accomplish the specific error handling.

Project Management

Quality of Product

Reflection