Difference between revisions of "Improved Decisions for Ocean FreightsAnalysis"
Mmphang.2012 (talk | contribs) |
Mmphang.2012 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
| − | |||
{| style="background-color:#ffffff; width:80%; font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:15px; margin: 3px auto 0 auto;" | | {| style="background-color:#ffffff; width:80%; font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:15px; margin: 3px auto 0 auto;" | | ||
| style="background-color:#006600; ; color:#ffffff; text-align: center; border-top:solid #ffffff; border-bottom:solid #ffffff; width:50%; " | | | style="background-color:#006600; ; color:#ffffff; text-align: center; border-top:solid #ffffff; border-bottom:solid #ffffff; width:50%; " | | ||
| Line 34: | Line 33: | ||
However, we see from the graph on the right that shipments originating from Fiji, Italy and Estonia have the lowest utilization rates. | However, we see from the graph on the right that shipments originating from Fiji, Italy and Estonia have the lowest utilization rates. | ||
As such, we are unable to see a clear relationship between the shipper country and utilization rates. | As such, we are unable to see a clear relationship between the shipper country and utilization rates. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br /> | ||
| + | {| style="background-color:#ffffff; width:80%; font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:15px; margin: 3px auto 0 auto;" | | ||
| + | | style="background-color:#006600; ; color:#ffffff; text-align: center; border-top:solid #ffffff; border-bottom:solid #ffffff; width:50%; " | | ||
| + | [[Improved_Decisions_for_Ocean_Freights|<span style="color:#ffffff"><strong>No clear relationship between consignee country and utilization rate</strong></span>]] | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |<br><center>[[File:UtilizationRatesByConsigneeCountry.png|1200px]]</center> | ||
| + | |||
| + | With the same X-axis and Y-axis, that is Consignee Country and Average Percentage Utilization, we realise that there is no similar trends between the 2 graphs with different industries (auto industry and engineering industry). | ||
| + | <br><br> | ||
| + | From the 2 graphs, we have come to the conclusion that neither shipper country nor consignee country have a big impact on the utilization rates. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 29 September 2015
|
No clear relationship between shipper country and utilization rate |
 We see from the graph on the left that shipments originating from Chile, Singapore and the United States have the lowest utilization rates. However, we see from the graph on the right that shipments originating from Fiji, Italy and Estonia have the lowest utilization rates. As such, we are unable to see a clear relationship between the shipper country and utilization rates. |
|
No clear relationship between consignee country and utilization rate |
 With the same X-axis and Y-axis, that is Consignee Country and Average Percentage Utilization, we realise that there is no similar trends between the 2 graphs with different industries (auto industry and engineering industry).
|
