Difference between revisions of "IS428 AY2019-20T2 Assign YIP JIAN MING Faculty"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jmyip.2016 (talk | contribs) |
Jmyip.2016 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
<strong>Performance</strong> | <strong>Performance</strong> | ||
− | [[File: | + | [[File:faculty4.png|800px]] |
{| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#FFFFFF;" width="90%" | {| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#FFFFFF;" width="90%" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 111: | Line 111: | ||
*The likert scale for performance shows the performance of the library services. I have placed the participants overall satisfaction as a benchmark for the metrics. The library should focus efforts on solving problems with low performance yet high importance. | *The likert scale for performance shows the performance of the library services. I have placed the participants overall satisfaction as a benchmark for the metrics. The library should focus efforts on solving problems with low performance yet high importance. | ||
− | *The 3 metrics that did the poorest for performance were for the questions “I can find a place in the Library to work in a group when I need to”,"I can find a quiet place to study in the library if I need to" and " | + | *The 3 metrics that did the poorest for performance were for the questions “I can find a place in the Library to work in a group when I need to”,"I can find a quiet place to study in the library if I need to" and "Printing, scanning and photocopying facilities in the Library meet my needs" Participants have voted these metrics in high importance but are met with low performance. |
*Another metric that did poorly for performance was the metric on “A computer is available when I need one. However, this metric was rated as low importance. Comparing performance with importance, this metric did relatively well. It is good that the library does not waste its resources on metrics that the users do not find important. | *Another metric that did poorly for performance was the metric on “A computer is available when I need one. However, this metric was rated as low importance. Comparing performance with importance, this metric did relatively well. It is good that the library does not waste its resources on metrics that the users do not find important. | ||
Line 118: | Line 118: | ||
*Create more co-working spaces in the library for students to do group activities. | *Create more co-working spaces in the library for students to do group activities. | ||
*Enforce the keeping of silence in the library. | *Enforce the keeping of silence in the library. | ||
− | *Improve | + | *Improve availability and stability of printing,scanning and photocopying services in the library. |
|- | |- |
Revision as of 21:23, 15 March 2020
Participant Distribution
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
|
Stated Preference vs Revealed Preference
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
|
|
Importance
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
|
|
Performance
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
|
|
Referral
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
|
|
Word Cloud (Positive)
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
|
|
Word Cloud (Negative)
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
|
|