Difference between revisions of "IS428 AY2019-20T2 YIP JIAN MING"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jmyip.2016 (talk | contribs) |
Jmyip.2016 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
<strong>Participant Distribution</strong> | <strong>Participant Distribution</strong> | ||
− | |||
[[File:UndergradParticipation.png|600px]][[File:Undergrad2.png|600px]] | [[File:UndergradParticipation.png|600px]][[File:Undergrad2.png|600px]] | ||
Line 52: | Line 51: | ||
[[File:Undergrad3..png|600]] | [[File:Undergrad3..png|600]] | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#FFFFFF;" width="90%" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! style="font-weight: bold;background: #141414;color:#fbfcfd;width: 50%;" | Insights | ||
+ | ! style="font-weight: bold;background: #141414;color:#fbfcfd;width: 50%;" | Recommendations | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | | ||
+ | *The Butterfly chart allows us to see the preferences the different faculties have for each library. As can be seen from the chart, with the exception of Law, all faculties had a strong preference for the Li Ka Shing Library. However, when we look at the overall satisfaction of students, business and economics school students rated the KGC library higher but frequented the LKS library more. | ||
+ | *This could be possibly due to the fact that when this survey was conducted in 2018, the Kwa Geok Choo Law Library was a relatively new library and most students would experience resistance to change. Another factor would be distancing. The KGC Law Library is relatively far from the rest of the faculties. | ||
+ | In 2018, there was lack of a sheltered walkway to the law school and also a lack of food options, both problems have since been addressed. | ||
+ | *Another reason could be naming of the library. The inclusion of the word “Law” in the Library name might create an impression of exclusiveness. | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | *Most of the problems have been addressed since 2018, however, there is still room for improvement in the F&B region. | ||
+ | *Possibly remove the word “Law” from the library name. | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | </br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | <strong>Performance vs Importance</strong> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Undergrad4.png|600]] | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#FFFFFF;" width="90%" | {| class="wikitable" style="background-color:#FFFFFF;" width="90%" | ||
|- | |- |
Revision as of 16:46, 15 March 2020
Participant Distribution
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
students, we see that daily visits are dominant. Participation in the survey also holds strong over the years. |
|
Stated Preference vs Revealed Preference
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
In 2018, there was lack of a sheltered walkway to the law school and also a lack of food options, both problems have since been addressed.
|
|
Performance vs Importance
Insights | Recommendations |
---|---|
In 2018, there was lack of a sheltered walkway to the law school and also a lack of food options, both problems have since been addressed.
|
|