SMT201 AY2019-20G1 Ex2 Yiap Mei Lin Andrea

From Geospatial Analytics for Urban Planning
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Part 1: Map layouts of Gombak planning subzone

with target roads


Inkedpt1roads LI.jpg


with buildings


Pt1 buildingss2.jpg


For buildings, I grouped these as offices

  • "Bukit Panjang Khek Community Guild"
  • "Galisian Family Service Centre",
  • "Lee Huat Motor Co" and
  • "Econ Medicare Centre"

with target natural features


Pt1natural .jpg


with digital elevation


Pt1dem .jpg


Target roads layer proximity


Pt2 roads prox.jpg


Buildings layer proximity


Pt2 buildings prox.jpg


Target natural features layer proximity


Pt2 natural prox.jpg


with slope layer


Pt2 slope.jpg


Part 2: Criterion scores of each factor layers

With reference to the legends, the higher the value, the more suitable it is.
Hence, for all the 4 views below, the part that is orange shows that it is the most suitable.
While the part that is light blue shows that it is the least suitable.


Economic Factor


Pt3 score slope.jpg


Accessibility Factor


Pt3 score roads.jpg


Health risk Factor


Pt3 score buildings.jpg


Natural conservation Factor


Pt3 score natural.jpg


Part 3: Analytical Hierarchical Process input matrix and result report


Ahp.PNG


From the result, it shows that the consistency index is within the acceptable range of 10% or less. According to the percentage output, this is how I viewed which has the most importance (in order):

  1. Health Risk
  2. Accessibility
  3. Economic
  4. Natural conservation

Part 4: Suitability Land Lot(s)


Finalz.jpg


There are two possible land lot(s). The first has an area of 13,591m2 and is the most ideal out of the two as it is the best fit location in meeting all the factors criterions. The second has an area of 10,950m2 and in comparison to the first, is slightly further from the residential buildings which is the utmost importance in the criterion rank. In conclusion, this only serves as a guide in identifying which parts would be suitable. Further analysis such as finding out the residents views of having the centre being built in their area is needed before going ahead with building the centre. Also, going down in person to check out the two locations identified is needed to verify its suitability.