From Geospatial Analytics for Urban Planning
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
|
| (10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 31: |
Line 31: |
| | | | |
| | [[File:G1 G1 lowerRes Poster.jpg|1000px|center]] | | [[File:G1 G1 lowerRes Poster.jpg|1000px|center]] |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==<div style="background: #8b1209; padding: 15px; line-height: 0.3em; text-indent: 15px; font-size:18px; font-family:Helvetica"><font color= #FFFFFF>1. Missing Area Analysis</font></div>==
| |
| − | <div style="font-family:Helvetica;font-size:16px">
| |
| − | As we observe the generated trade areas, it seems there are some areas which are not covered by any of the branches. Hence, we decided to analyse these areas.
| |
| − | [[File:q1.png|300px|center]]
| |
| − | <center>''Missing area 1''</center>
| |
| − | <br/>
| |
| − | In the above figure, the uncovered area is 大安森林公园 which is a park. As it is not common to order a pizza to a park, being uncovered is to be expected.
| |
| − | [[File:q2.png|300px|center]]
| |
| − | <center>''Missing area 2''</center>
| |
| − | <br/>
| |
| − | In the above figure, we do see buildings that are not in any trade area. Therefore, this uncovered area may have been omitted and should be fulfilled by one of the branches.
| |
Latest revision as of 19:42, 22 November 2019
