SMT201 AY2019-20T1 EX1 Goh Jia Xin Genice

From Geospatial Analytics for Urban Planning
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Part 1: Thematic Mapping

Distribution of Public Education Institutes

Distribution of Public Education Institutes

Description

I used the variable ‘Institution’ to categorise the data and show the distribution of public education institution by school types. I chose different SVG markers of the same colour to differentiate the school types because I felt that it was much easier to visualise the distribution in this way.

We can see that primary and secondary schools are more evenly distributed across the island as compared to the other types. The mixed level schools and the junior colleges are mostly concentrated towards the central area of Singapore, with fewer of them located in the other areas.

Hierarchy of Road Network System

Hierarchy of Road Network System

Description

I used ‘SymbolID’ to categorise the data and show the hierarchy of the road network system. I used different coloured lines of different thickness to differentiate the different road types because I felt that it was much easier to visualize this way. The lines representing expressway are the thickest, followed by major roads and expressway sliproads.


2014 Master Landuse Planning

2014 Master Plan Landuse

Description

I used the column ‘LU_DESC’ to categorise the data and show the thematic map of the 2014 Master Plan LandUse. The map was initially in many different colours and was very visually messy. Thus, I merged categories which are similar in nature to eventually have 6 large categories, which allowed for easier visualization and analysis. For example, areas which have business uses are categorised into a huge category named as "Business Areas".

Part 2: Chloropeth Mapping

Aged Population (65+) in 2010 and 2018

Aged Population in 2010
Aged Population in 2018

Description

These maps show the spatial variation of aged population (65 and above) across Singapore in 2010 and 2018 respectively. The increase in the number of subzones which are coloured with a greater intensity of green from 2010 and 2018 evidently shows that the number of Singapore Residents who are aged 65 and above is on the rise.


Proportion of Aged Population (65+) in 2010 and 2018

Proportion of Aged Population in 2010
Proportion of Aged Population in 2018

Description

These maps show the spatial variation of the proportion of aged population (65 and above) across Singapore in 2010 and 2018 respectively. Likewise, the proportion of aged population in 2010 and 2018 follows a similar trend as the aged population. The increase in the number of subzones which are coloured with a greater intensity of red from 2010 and 2018 evidently shows that the proportion of Singapore Residents who are aged 65 and above is on the rise.


Percentage Change Of Aged Population in 2010 and 2018

Percentage Change of Aged Population between 2010 and 2018

Description

This map depicts the spatial variation of the percentage change of aged population between 2010 and 2018 across Singapore. We can see that approximately half of the subzones experience a percentage increase in aged population between 2010 and 2018. This supports the fact that Singapore is experiencing a silver tsunami and the number of Singapore Residents who are aged 65 and over is on the rise.


Discussion

I extracted data from the master file provided by the Department of Statistics Singapore and separated them into 2 CSV files containing the 2010 and 2018 Population Age Group Data respectively. I replaced the missing values in the CSV files with 0 to allow for a more accurate visualization and analysis afterwards.

I joined the 2010 Population Age Group Data and 2018 Population Age Group Data with the 2008 Subzone Planning Map and 2014 Subzone Planning Map respectively. I created a new variable named ‘Age65+’ and added it to both the joined tables, which stores the value of aged population in the individual subzones. I calculated it by summing the number of residents aged 65 and above in each subzone. I also created another variable named ‘Proportion_Age65+’ to store the proportion of aged population in the subzones and it is calculated taking ‘Age65+’/ Total population.

To obtain the map of percentage change of aged population between 2010 and 2018, I joined the 2010 and 2018 Population Age Group Data to the 2014 Subzone Planning Map. With the knowledge that some subzones in the 2010 Population Age Group do not exist in the 2014 Subzone Planning Map, I did a rule-based symbology to obtain all unavailable subzones instead of replacing their values with 0. I also created another variable named ‘Percentage Change’ and added it to the joined table. It is calculated by taking (‘ProportionAge65+_2018’ – ‘ProportionAge65+_2010’) * 100.

For all maps, I used the Graduate symbology with the mode ‘Natural Jenks’ to create the chloropeth maps. I used the ‘Age65+’ column to classify the data to obtain the maps of Aged Population in 2010 and 2018 respectively while I used the ‘ProportionAge65+’ column to classify the data to obtain the maps of Proportion of Aged Population in 2010 and 2018 respectively. Lastly, I used the ‘PercentageChange’ column to classify the data to get the map of Percentage Change of Aged Population between 2010 and 2018.