ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Chan En Ying Grace Conclusion

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Revision as of 14:49, 23 June 2018 by Gracechan.2017 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div style=background:#E6E6FA border:#A3BFB1> 300px <b><font size = 6; color="#000000"> “Mine dear rose pipits, whence did do thou vanish?” </fo...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Rose Pipits.png “Mine dear rose pipits, whence did do thou vanish?”

Background

Methodology

Did Rose Pipit kicketh the bucket?

Which song belongs to thee?

Conclusion

 


Conclusion: "Pipits have not kicked the bucket, but are starting to. "

First Hypothesis: Pipits surviving, but not thriving on the Preserve.

Key Observations

1. Pipit clusters were significant in 2013 to 2017.
2. Pipit population peaked in 2015, but fell from 2016.
3. Pipit homerange moved away from dumping site, from 2015
4. Pipit clusters significant in 2012-2016, but became less compact from 2015 and lost its significance in 2017 for radius < 5
5. Pipits stopped singing after 2015. Songs turned into Calls - a sign of distress.
6. Pipits were the only species affected (i.e. their homerange & population).
7. Control Groups (Ordinary Snape & Lesser Birchbeere) thrived and even have their homerange move closer to the dumping site

Hypothesis: Signs of Dumping But Affected Pipits Only

Rose Pipits were still surviving as its clusters still exist and were significant, until 2017. However, they were not thriving at the dumping site and had to move away from it. Moreover, its population had fallen. This was especially since 2015 was the year that songs turned to calls, moreover, the control groups – OS and LB – did not experience a fall in population and in fact even increased in population and moved closer to the dumping site from 2015, respectively.

So, I conclude that there were signs of Dumping and this was likely to take place in 2015, but the Dumping most likely consisted of chemicals that affected mainly the Rose Pipits, and not the other species.


Second Hypothesis: Pipits NOT being found across the Preserve, based on Kasios Birds

Key Observations

1. Only 2 out of the 15 birds have resemblance to the Rose Pipits.
2. These 2 birds were not found near the dumping site, neither were they found in the previous 2 clusters identified.

Hypothesis: Pipits not found across preserve

Given that only 2 of the 15 birds provided by Kasios were likely to be Pipits, Kasios' claim that the Pipits were thriving across the Preserve is doubted. Based on the set of bird calls supplied by Kasios, it does not support the claim of Pipits being found across the Preserve.


Next Steps to be Taken: Need for RCT to determine if Dumping was the cause

However, we have not confirmed whether dumping was the cause. If it did, then it only affected the Rose Pipits. If it did not, then there must be something else causing the slow death of Pipits.

To test our hypothesis to determine whether it is the dumping that caused it, we can conduct a Randomised Control Trial. Introduce the dumping substance and put a Rose Pipit and an Ordinary Snape together. Make all other variables constant. If only the Rose Pipit dies, while the Ordinary Snape survives, then our hypothesis is correct.