Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Gao Jiaoyang Conclusion"
Jygao.2017 (talk | contribs) |
Jygao.2017 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
[[Image:GJY new.jpg|600px]] | [[Image:GJY new.jpg|600px]] | ||
− | Through the map, we can see that the '''''Kohsoom''''' has the highest value of new chemicals and the '''''Chai'''' has the lowest value. Also the river route should be '''''Kohsoom''''' to '''''Chai'''''. | + | Through the map, we can see that the '''''Kohsoom''''' has the highest value of new chemicals and the '''''Chai''''' has the lowest value. Also the river route should be '''''Kohsoom''''' to '''''Chai'''''. |
[[Image:GJY map of chemicals.jpg|600px]] | [[Image:GJY map of chemicals.jpg|600px]] |
Revision as of 17:09, 8 July 2018
|
|
|
|
Conclusion
Question1
Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways. Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation? Your submission for this questions should contain no more than 10 images and 1000 words.
Question2
What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.
Question3
After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.