Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Gao Jiaoyang Conclusion"
Jygao.2017 (talk | contribs) |
Jygao.2017 (talk | contribs) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
<td> Now the records of '''''Macrozoobenthos''''' are not continuously as they were before, '''''Busarakhan''''' and '''''Somchair''''' did not record since 2008. | <td> Now the records of '''''Macrozoobenthos''''' are not continuously as they were before, '''''Busarakhan''''' and '''''Somchair''''' did not record since 2008. | ||
− | The values of '''''Macrozoobenthos''''' are not change too much from 1998 to 2013, but in 2014 it suddenly increased to 36 in '''''Kannika''''' and 37 in '''''Sakda''''' , then the values came back to around 2 in the next year. Since the higher value of '''''Macrozoobenthos''''' may indicate the better water quality, we may have a guess that the water quality had | + | The values of '''''Macrozoobenthos''''' are not change too much from 1998 to 2013, but in 2014 it suddenly increased to 36 in '''''Kannika''''' and 37 in '''''Sakda''''' , then the values came back to around 2 in the next year. Since the higher value of '''''Macrozoobenthos''''' may indicate the better water quality, we may have a guess that the water quality had an improvement in 2014 at this two location. |
[[Image:GJY M.jpg|600px]] </td> | [[Image:GJY M.jpg|600px]] </td> | ||
Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
If we transform the raw dataset by split the measure into column, we can explore the missing pattern more directly. | If we transform the raw dataset by split the measure into column, we can explore the missing pattern more directly. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:missing.jpg|800px]] | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 96: | Line 98: | ||
<td><b> Improper Timestamp </b> | <td><b> Improper Timestamp </b> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> The raw dataset includes multiple records of the same measure | + | <td> The raw dataset includes multiple records of the same measure on the same date at the same location with different values. This may due to the different test time on that day if so, the timestamp should also include the precise time on that day instead of only the date. This issue may confuse investigators and also result in the wrong conclusion. |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 103: | Line 105: | ||
<td><b> Insufficient Data Source </b> | <td><b> Insufficient Data Source </b> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> If we want to detect the water pollution, we need more information to define the situation not just the timeline records. First, a large number of objective conditions may affect data measurements, which makes the data less "objective." Second, if we want to make sure that water pollution is related to he Kasios Furniture Company, we also need emissions data from Kasios. Third, a detailed data description will be more helpful. | + | <td> If we want to detect the water pollution, we need more information to define the situation, not just the timeline records. First, a large number of objective conditions may affect data measurements, which makes the data less "objective." Second, if we want to make sure that water pollution is related to he Kasios Furniture Company, we also need emissions data from Kasios. Third, a detailed data description will be more helpful. |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 126: | Line 128: | ||
<td><b> Supply Information </b> | <td><b> Supply Information </b> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
− | <td> | + | <td> |
− | + | * Offer other relative information for us to better understanding the whole scoop, such as the weather and human activities etc. Because these kinds of information also can contribute to the water and soil pollution. | |
+ | |||
+ | * Raw data only offer the value of the measure, but actually, we also need to compare the situation among the 10 location site. However, we do not have any other information about these location sites except the river geographic map. more information about these sites would be helpful for us to do the comparison. | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 135: | Line 139: | ||
===<font size="3"><font color="#8B4513"> Question3</font></font>=== | ===<font size="3"><font color="#8B4513"> Question3</font></font>=== | ||
After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words. | After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===<font size="2"><font color="#8B4513"> Finding</font></font>=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <table border='1'> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Measure</th> | ||
+ | <th>Details</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><b> Macrozootenthos</b> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td>Benthic animals have a variety of ecological functions in the aquatic ecosystem. It can accelerate the decomposition of underwater debris to improve the self-purification of water bodies. It is also an important part of the nutrient niche of aquatic ecosystems. It is a natural live bait for fish. The material cycle and energy flow of aquatic ecosystems play an important role. Therefore, it has a good indication of environmental changes. The data shows macrozoobenthos are relatively active at '''''Sakda''''' and '''''Kannika''''' in 2014. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Image:GJY S1.jpg|800px]] | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===<font size="2"><font color="#8B4513"> Suggestion</font></font>=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table> | ||
+ | <table border='1'> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <th>Suggestion</th> | ||
+ | <th>Details</th> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><b> More information about the Pipit or other wildlife </b> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | *Current dataset only include the water properties and chemicals, if we're going to consider more about the wildlife, we need more data as well, such as the human activity and plant which may affect their life. | ||
+ | *Can record more animal relative data such as '''''Macrozoobenthos''''' in the current dataset. | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><b> More information about the location </b> | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | Currently, we only have a waterway map of the locations, we cannot do more exploration without more detail information. More precise data would help such as longitude and latitude. | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
==<font size="5"><font color="#8B4513">'''Reference'''</font></font>== | ==<font size="5"><font color="#8B4513">'''Reference'''</font></font>== | ||
+ | |||
+ | background picture '''http://mentalfloss.com/article/74606/science-explains-ducks-rare-pink-feathers''' |
Latest revision as of 20:38, 8 July 2018
|
|
|
|
Contents
Conclusion
Question1
Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways. Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation? Your submission for this questions should contain no more than 10 images and 1000 words.
Question2
What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.
Data Issue
Anomalies | Details |
---|---|
Incomplete Data | Neither the test variables nor the date of the test seem to be random and chaotic. The date of the test is not continuous and there is no regularity, always suddenly record some measures and then stop without given any reasons. Apart from that, the test variables are not uniform, and most test data on test days are incomplete. Also, test times are rarely the same at different locations. All of these are likely to result in errors in subsequent data analysis. Because, if different test locations are compared with data from different test dates and variables, the results obtained are of little significance.
If we transform the raw dataset by split the measure into column, we can explore the missing pattern more directly. |
Improper Timestamp | The raw dataset includes multiple records of the same measure on the same date at the same location with different values. This may due to the different test time on that day if so, the timestamp should also include the precise time on that day instead of only the date. This issue may confuse investigators and also result in the wrong conclusion. |
Insufficient Data Source | If we want to detect the water pollution, we need more information to define the situation, not just the timeline records. First, a large number of objective conditions may affect data measurements, which makes the data less "objective." Second, if we want to make sure that water pollution is related to he Kasios Furniture Company, we also need emissions data from Kasios. Third, a detailed data description will be more helpful. |
Proposal Change
Proposal | Details |
---|---|
Regularise Record | The records should be regularised and unify to improve the quality of the data. Trying to unify the measure and date to improve the accuracy and the reliability of the research result |
Supply Information |
|
Question3
After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.
Finding
Measure | Details |
---|---|
Macrozootenthos | Benthic animals have a variety of ecological functions in the aquatic ecosystem. It can accelerate the decomposition of underwater debris to improve the self-purification of water bodies. It is also an important part of the nutrient niche of aquatic ecosystems. It is a natural live bait for fish. The material cycle and energy flow of aquatic ecosystems play an important role. Therefore, it has a good indication of environmental changes. The data shows macrozoobenthos are relatively active at Sakda and Kannika in 2014. |
Suggestion
Suggestion | Details |
---|---|
More information about the Pipit or other wildlife |
|
More information about the location |
Currently, we only have a waterway map of the locations, we cannot do more exploration without more detail information. More precise data would help such as longitude and latitude. |
Reference
background picture http://mentalfloss.com/article/74606/science-explains-ducks-rare-pink-feathers