ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Aakanksha Kumari Q3

MC Challenge 3

Overview

Data Preparation

Question 1

Question 2

Question 3

Question 4

Conclusion

Dropbox

Using the combined group of suspected bad actors, you created in question 2, show the interactions within the group over time. Characterize the group’s organizational structure and show a full picture of communications within the group. Does the group composition change during the course of their activities? How do the group’s interactions change over time?

The Story So Far

The Kasios International over the course of two and half years have maintained nearly same communicationa volumne and purchase pattern, which implies that the organization have not grown or shrunk significantly. But on closer analysis we found out with each year, the new employees were being hired, and there is constant shuffling of human resource. Kasios have grow significant change in personnels, with numnber of same employees each month decreasing. Intially we began with certain suspicious transactions (purchaes and communication) as provided by our informer. Later as we continued our analysis, othe key players, closely associated to employees making suspicious communication were identified. Using network analysis and eigenvector centrality (filter value > 0.4), nodes connected to influential nodes (in this case, suspicious employees) more than other non-influential nodes(non suspicious employees), can be identified. So by following the above startegy following are list of old and new suspicious players. Original Suspicious Employess Augusta Sharp, Tobi Gatlin ,Patrick Lane, Melita Scarpaci, Rosalia Larroque, Glen Grant ,Meryl Pastuch, Dylan Ballard, May Burton, Kerstin Belveal, Alex Hall, Refugio Orrantia, Jose Ringwald, Julie Tierno, Richard Fox, Lizbeth Jindra, Ramiro Gault, Sara Ballard, Jenice Savaria, Lindsy Henion New Suspicious Employees Ferne Hards, Martha Harris, Sherrell Biebel, Gail Feindt, Sheilah Stachniw, Madeline Nindorf So now our focus is on these 26 key players, as discussed in Q2 Main Tasks in this section Using the combined group of suspected bad actors you created in question 2, show the interactions within the group over time. Characterize the group’s organizational structure and show a full picture of communications within the group. Does the group composition change during the course of their activities? How do the group’s interactions change over time?

The Combined Communication Picture

Using modularity algoithm, and assigning distinct class color, the graph is clustered into 5 classes. This helps in better visualization, and also identifying key players in each cluster. All the clusters are discusses individually later. What can we learn Purchases are few in between. Key players involved are Gail Feindt, Richard Fox and Meryl Pastuch. Organization communication structure is hierarchial. Which means only few key players from each cluster communicates with key players from other cluster. Less meetings, mainly happenig between inter cluster groups.

Clusters Discussed Individually

Cluster 1 (Red)

Main Channel of Interaction: Purchase Key Players: Gail Feindt, Richard Fox and Meryl Pastuch

Cluster 2 (Dark Green) (Small cluster, connected through call)

Main Channel of Interaction: Call Key Players: Lizbeth Jindra, Madeline Nindorf

Cluster 3 (Pink)

Main Channel of Interaction: Email, Call Key Players: Lindsy Henion, Sheilah Stachniw, Kerstin Belveal

Cluster 4 (Light Green)

Main Channel of Interaction: Email, Call Key Players: Sherrell Biebel, Tobi Gatlin, Julie Tierno

Cluster 5 (Blue)

Main Channel of Interaction: Email Key Players: Glen Grant

Group composition over different activities

Calls

Large number of call happens intra cluster. But a few calls do happen inter clusters. Most of calls which are across clusters, are to Purchase cluster.

Emails

Primary method of communication within each cluster. Gail Feindt is not connected to any node thorugh email. Major recipents of email outside cluster is Richar Fox and Meryl Pastuch.

Meetings

Meetings shows the most interesting pattern.

• Meetings mostly happen inter cluster.
• Blue Cluster, did not participate in any meetings. Which clears them of any suspicion.
• Meetings primarly connect Red cluster, yet again.
• Gail Feindt is again not connected to any employee through meetings.

Purchases

Purchases (combined with meetings) hints towards source of all suspicion. Gail Feind in the center of it all. No purchases intra-cluster. Key players iniating purchases are Richar Fox, Meryl Pastuch, Tobi Gatlin, Sheilah Stachniw, Lizbeth Jindra Each cluster other than blue is making purhcases with Gail Feind. (As previously mentioned employees in blue cluster were already clear of suspicion) Tobi Gatlin, Sheilah Stachniw, Lizabeth Jindra did not attend any suspicious meetings with Richard Fox or Meryl Pastuch. This probably mean that these employees are only ordering purchases from Gail Feind from orders passed by other players who actually attend the meetings. This implies that these employees are only means of making suspicious purchases, the strings are pulled from behind by other key employees who attend the meetings and are in close contact with Richard Fox and Meryl Pastuch.