Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2017-18 T3 Assign Gao Jiaoyang"

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #000000; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #000000; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
;
 
;
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang|<b><font size="3"><font color="#8B4513">Background</font></font></b>]]
+
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang|<b><font size="4"><font color="#8B4513">Background</font></font></b>]]
  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
;
 
;
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang_Data_Preparation|<b><font size="3"><font color="#8B4513">Data Preparation & Data Overview</font></font></b>]]
+
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang_Data_Preparation|<b><font size="2.5"><font color="#8B4513">Data Description & Data Preparation</font></font></b>]]
  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
;
 
;
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang_Visualization|<b><font size="3"><font color="#8B4513">Methodology & Insight/Answer</font></font></b>]]
+
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang_Visualization|<b><font size="2.5"><font color="#8B4513">Visualization</font></font></b>]]
  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
| style="font-family:Century Gothic; font-size:100%; solid #1B338F; background:#f5c5aa; text-align:center;" width="25%" |  
 
;
 
;
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang_Conclusion| <b><font size="3"><font color="#8B4513">Conclusion</font></font></b>]]
+
[[ISSS608_2017-18_T3_Assign_Gao_Jiaoyang_Conclusion| <b><font size="2.5"><font color="#8B4513">Conclusion & Reference</font></font></b>]]
  
 
|  &nbsp;
 
|  &nbsp;
 
|}
 
|}
 
<br/>
 
<br/>
=='''Introduction'''==
+
==<font color = "#8B4513">Introduction</font>==
 
Last year, the Kasios Furniture Company was implicated in environmental damage to the Boonsong Lekagul Wildlife Preserve for both dumping toxic waste and polluting the air with chemicals from its manufacturing process. But Kasios is not taking these accusations lying down, and they deny any accusation of industrial waste dumping! Kasios’ spokespersons state that there isn’t any ground contamination near the remote ranger station that was suggested by last year’s mini-challenge 1 and 3 participants, and they have inspected that area and found it as pristine as the rest of the preserve. ''[http://vacommunity.org/VAST+Challenge+2018+MC2 VAST 2018 MC2]'' &nbsp;<br/>
 
Last year, the Kasios Furniture Company was implicated in environmental damage to the Boonsong Lekagul Wildlife Preserve for both dumping toxic waste and polluting the air with chemicals from its manufacturing process. But Kasios is not taking these accusations lying down, and they deny any accusation of industrial waste dumping! Kasios’ spokespersons state that there isn’t any ground contamination near the remote ranger station that was suggested by last year’s mini-challenge 1 and 3 participants, and they have inspected that area and found it as pristine as the rest of the preserve. ''[http://vacommunity.org/VAST+Challenge+2018+MC2 VAST 2018 MC2]'' &nbsp;<br/>
  
 
Outraged ornithology professors from Mistford College journeyed out to look over the dumping site themselves and perform soil analyses. They returned to report that the site looked like there had been recent excavation and building activities going on. Boonsong Preserve rangers later confirmed that a new ranger station was being built at that site! Soil samples taken from the site were inconclusive in detecting Methylosmolene (the toxic manufacturing chemical in the suspected dumping) or any other contaminant, as new top soil had been trucked in.<br/>
 
Outraged ornithology professors from Mistford College journeyed out to look over the dumping site themselves and perform soil analyses. They returned to report that the site looked like there had been recent excavation and building activities going on. Boonsong Preserve rangers later confirmed that a new ranger station was being built at that site! Soil samples taken from the site were inconclusive in detecting Methylosmolene (the toxic manufacturing chemical in the suspected dumping) or any other contaminant, as new top soil had been trucked in.<br/>
  
==='''Objective'''===
+
==<font color = "#8B4513">Objective</font>==
 
With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed?<br/>
 
With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed?<br/>
  
 
The task is to investigate the hydrology data from across the Preserve. A map of the Preserve (with the same base as last year’s challenge), with named sampling sites indicated on the map (the names have local significance, but are just mnemonics for your study) and readings from each sampling station over time for several different chemicals and water properties are provided.<br/>
 
The task is to investigate the hydrology data from across the Preserve. A map of the Preserve (with the same base as last year’s challenge), with named sampling sites indicated on the map (the names have local significance, but are just mnemonics for your study) and readings from each sampling station over time for several different chemicals and water properties are provided.<br/>
  
=='''Questions'''==
+
==<font color = "#8B4513">Questions</font>==
 
#Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways. Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation? Your submission for this questions should contain no more than 10 images and 1000 words.  
 
#Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways. Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation? Your submission for this questions should contain no more than 10 images and 1000 words.  
 
#What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.  
 
#What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.  
 
#After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.
 
#After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.
  
=='''Data Description'''==
+
==<font color = "#8B4513">Acknowledgement</font>==
Below are raw datasets provided to perform this visual analytics project.
+
Prepare by:
 
 
==='''Dataset'''===
 
#Boonsong Lekagul waterways readings.csv
 
#Chemical units of measure.csv
 
 
 
==='''Variable Description'''===
 
*'''Id''': Identification number for the record (only for bookkeeping)
 
*'''Value''': Measured value for the chemical or property in this record
 
*'''Location''': Name of the location sample was taken from.  See the map for geo-location of the sampling site. 
 
*'''Sample Date''': Date sample was taken from the location
 
*'''Measure''': Chemicals (e.g., Sodium) or water properties (e.g., Water temperature) measured in the record
 
*'''Unit''': chemical units of measures
 
 
 
=='''Acknowledgement'''==
 
Work by:
 
 
*Gao Jiaoyang
 
*Gao Jiaoyang
 
*Contact Email: jygao.2017@mitb.smu.edu.sg
 
*Contact Email: jygao.2017@mitb.smu.edu.sg

Latest revision as of 08:41, 8 July 2018

Duck pic.jpg VAST Challenge 2018 MC2: Like a Duck to Water

Background

Data Description & Data Preparation

Visualization

Conclusion & Reference

 


Introduction

Last year, the Kasios Furniture Company was implicated in environmental damage to the Boonsong Lekagul Wildlife Preserve for both dumping toxic waste and polluting the air with chemicals from its manufacturing process. But Kasios is not taking these accusations lying down, and they deny any accusation of industrial waste dumping! Kasios’ spokespersons state that there isn’t any ground contamination near the remote ranger station that was suggested by last year’s mini-challenge 1 and 3 participants, and they have inspected that area and found it as pristine as the rest of the preserve. VAST 2018 MC2  

Outraged ornithology professors from Mistford College journeyed out to look over the dumping site themselves and perform soil analyses. They returned to report that the site looked like there had been recent excavation and building activities going on. Boonsong Preserve rangers later confirmed that a new ranger station was being built at that site! Soil samples taken from the site were inconclusive in detecting Methylosmolene (the toxic manufacturing chemical in the suspected dumping) or any other contaminant, as new top soil had been trucked in.

Objective

With a primary piece of evidence against Kasios now gone, investigators will need to take another approach. Professors in the Mistford College Hydrology Department have come forward with several years of water sensor readings from rivers and streams in the preserve. These samples were taken from different locations scattered throughout the area and contain measurements of several chemicals of possible interest, but they have never been analyzed due to lack of funding. Could visual analytics help reveal something in this data that could make up for the soil evidence that was destroyed?

The task is to investigate the hydrology data from across the Preserve. A map of the Preserve (with the same base as last year’s challenge), with named sampling sites indicated on the map (the names have local significance, but are just mnemonics for your study) and readings from each sampling station over time for several different chemicals and water properties are provided.

Questions

  1. Characterize the past and most recent situation with respect to chemical contamination in the Boonsong Lekagul waterways. Do you see any trends of possible interest in this investigation? Your submission for this questions should contain no more than 10 images and 1000 words.
  2. What anomalies do you find in the waterway samples dataset? How do these affect your analysis of potential problems to the environment? Is the Hydrology Department collecting sufficient data to understand the comprehensive situation across the Preserve? What changes would you propose to make in the sampling approach to best understand the situation? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.
  3. After reviewing the data, do any of your findings cause particular concern for the Pipit or other wildlife? Would you suggest any changes in the sampling strategy to better understand the waterways situation in the Preserve? Your submission for this question should contain no more than 6 images and 500 words.

Acknowledgement

Prepare by:

  • Gao Jiaoyang
  • Contact Email: jygao.2017@mitb.smu.edu.sg

Professor:

  • DR. KAM Tin Seong