Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2016-17 T3 Assign MAO CHENXIN"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | <br/> | + | <br/>==Abstract== |
− | == | ||
− | |||
Contents<br> | Contents<br> | ||
# 1<br> | # 1<br> | ||
# 2<br> | # 2<br> | ||
# 3<br> | # 3<br> | ||
− | <br> | + | |
− | + | <br/>==Dataset== | |
− | |||
The dataset is taken from Visual Analytics Community: VAST Challenge 2017 Mini Challenge 1.<references />[http://www.vacommunity.org/VAST+Challenge+2017+MC1], which is: | The dataset is taken from Visual Analytics Community: VAST Challenge 2017 Mini Challenge 1.<references />[http://www.vacommunity.org/VAST+Challenge+2017+MC1], which is: | ||
“[an]Ongoing research on university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. Based on a Technology Acceptance Model, the relationships within the internal and external constructs of the model are analysed. Both the perception of colleagues’ opinion about Wikipedia and the perceived quality of the information in Wikipedia play a central role in the obtained model.”<br> | “[an]Ongoing research on university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. Based on a Technology Acceptance Model, the relationships within the internal and external constructs of the model are analysed. Both the perception of colleagues’ opinion about Wikipedia and the perceived quality of the information in Wikipedia play a central role in the obtained model.”<br> | ||
− | < | + | <br/>==Data Preparation== |
Contents <br> | Contents <br> | ||
− | <br> | + | |
− | + | <br/>==Conclusion== | |
Contents | Contents |
Revision as of 15:24, 3 July 2017
==Abstract==
Contents
- 1
- 2
- 3
==Dataset==
The dataset is taken from Visual Analytics Community: VAST Challenge 2017 Mini Challenge 1.[1], which is:
“[an]Ongoing research on university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. Based on a Technology Acceptance Model, the relationships within the internal and external constructs of the model are analysed. Both the perception of colleagues’ opinion about Wikipedia and the perceived quality of the information in Wikipedia play a central role in the obtained model.”
==Data Preparation==
Contents
==Conclusion==
Contents