Difference between revisions of "ISSS608 2016-17 T3 Assign MAO CHENXIN"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
# 3<br> | # 3<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | ||
<h1>Dataset</h1> | <h1>Dataset</h1> | ||
The dataset is taken from UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository: wiki4HE Data Set.<references />[https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/wiki4HE], which is: | The dataset is taken from UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository: wiki4HE Data Set.<references />[https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/wiki4HE], which is: | ||
“[an]Ongoing research on university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. Based on a Technology Acceptance Model, the relationships within the internal and external constructs of the model are analysed. Both the perception of colleagues’ opinion about Wikipedia and the perceived quality of the information in Wikipedia play a central role in the obtained model.”<br> | “[an]Ongoing research on university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. Based on a Technology Acceptance Model, the relationships within the internal and external constructs of the model are analysed. Both the perception of colleagues’ opinion about Wikipedia and the perceived quality of the information in Wikipedia play a central role in the obtained model.”<br> | ||
+ | |||
<h2>Data Preparation</h2> | <h2>Data Preparation</h2> | ||
Contents <br> | Contents <br> |
Revision as of 11:26, 3 July 2017
Abstract
Contents
- 1
- 2
- 3
Dataset
The dataset is taken from UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository: wiki4HE Data Set.[1], which is:
“[an]Ongoing research on university faculty perceptions and practices of using Wikipedia as a teaching resource. Based on a Technology Acceptance Model, the relationships within the internal and external constructs of the model are analysed. Both the perception of colleagues’ opinion about Wikipedia and the perceived quality of the information in Wikipedia play a central role in the obtained model.”
Data Preparation
Contents
Conclusion
Contents