ISSS608 2016-17 T1 Assign2 Ho Li Chin

Abstract

In this assignment, the interactive data exploration and the analysis techniques will be applied to discovery patterns in multivariate data.

Theme of Interest

In this assignment, the dataset that have been chosen for the analysis is “wiki4HE Data Set” (https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/wiki4HE).

The theme of interest is to explore the factors affecting the use of Wikipedia in Higher Education. Wiki technology emerged in higher education teaching and learning experiences as early as 1999 and is integrated into many courses for its ability to provide a collaborative environment for Academic staff and students.

The objective of this assignment is to understand the main factors that influence the teaching uses of Wikipedia among university faculty staff, and any of those factors have significant direct impact on the Behavioral Intention of adopting Wikipedia in higher education, for providing more effective and efficient methods to maximize the teaching and learning experience.

Examine the Survey Questions

In this section, we will first examine the survey questions in the dataset. The survey questions are categorized into respective broader category, and each category is linked to one construct measure for investigation. The following measures will be considered to further derive the investigation questions in next section for the purpose of the analysis.

Survey Question Category	Survey Questions (Variables)	Measures
Perceived Usefulness	PU1: The use of Wikipedia makes it easier for students to develop new skills. PU2: The use of Wikipedia improves students' learning PU3: Wikipedia is useful for teaching User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology	User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology
Perceived Ease of Use	PEU1: Wikipedia is user friendly PEU2: It is easy to find in Wikipedia the information you seek PEU3: It is easy to add or edit information in Wikipedia	User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology
Perceived Enjoyment	ENJ1: The use of Wikipedia stimulates curiosity ENJ2: The use of Wikipedia is entertaining	User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology
Use behaviour	USE1: I use Wikipedia to develop my teaching materials USE2: I use Wikipedia as a platform to develop educational activities with students USE3: I recommend my students to use Wikipedia USE4: I recommend my colleagues to use Wikipedia USE5: I agree my students use Wikipedia in my courses	Motivation to use wiki
Experience	EXP1: I consult Wikipedia for issues related to my field of expertise EXP2: I consult Wikipedia for other academic related issues EXP3: I consult Wikipedia for personal issues EXP4: I contribute to Wikipedia (editions, revisions, articles improvement...) EXP5: I use wikis to work with my students	Motivation to use wiki
Job relevance	JR1: My university promotes the use of open collaborative environments in the Internet JR2: My university considers the use of open collaborative environments in the Internet as a teaching merit	Motivation to use wiki
Sharing attitude	SA1: It is important to share academic content in open platforms SA2: It is important to publish research results in other media than academic journals or books SA3: It is important that students become familiar with online collaborative environments	Collaborative Mindset / Attitude
Profile 2.0	PF1: I contribute to blogs PF2: I actively participate in social networks PF3: I publish academic content in open platforms	Collaborative Mindset / Attitude
Quality	QU1: Articles in Wikipedia are reliable QU2: Articles in Wikipedia are updated QU3: Articles in Wikipedia are comprehensive QU4: In my area of expertise, Wikipedia has a lower quality than other educational resources QU5: I trust in the editing system of Wikipedia	Perceived quality of wiki information
Social Image	IM1: The use of Wikipedia is well considered among colleagues IM2: In academia, sharing open educational resources is appreciated IM3: My colleagues use Wikipedia	Social Influence
Visibility	VIS1: Wikipedia improves visibility of students' work VIS2: It is easy to have a record of the contributions made in Wikipedia VIS3: I cite Wikipedia in my academic papers	Social Influence
Behavioral intention	BI1: In the future I will recommend the use of Wikipedia to my colleagues and students BI2: In the future I will use Wikipedia in my teaching activity Incentives	Intention to use wiki
Incentives	INC1: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: a best practices guide INC2: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: getting instruction from a colleague INC3: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: getting specific training INC4: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: greater institutional recognition	Pedagogical Support to use wiki

Questions for Investigation

From the construct measures as defined in Section 2, following are the evolved list of questions for investigation. Different visualizations will be constructed ito present the data and to answer the questions as clearly as possible.

List of questions for investigation:

• a) Relationship between the different measures that could influence the uses of Wikipedia among university faculty.
  • What are the positive factors and negative influence factors?

• b) Understanding of each measure, as listed below, that could influence the behavior intention to use Wikipedia
  • User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology (Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment using wiki)
  • Motivation factors to use Wikipedia
  • The mindset / attitude on collaborative practice using wiki
  • Perceived quality of information using wiki
  • Social influence

• c) Finally, putting all the measures as in part (2) together, we would like to find out:
  • Any identification of variables (e.g. age, academic position, current wiki user etc) that could influence the behavior intention to use wiki
    
  • Detect any skeptical attitudes in university faculty regards using Wikipedia in class and establish if they are related to generational and disciplinary factors or any implicit conflict between the scientific academic culture and Wikipedia culture.
    

Analysis of Wiki For Higher Education Dataset through Visualisation

Visualisation to answer the questions under investigation

Demographics Profiles of the University Faculty Staff

First, before we analyse on the survey variables that could affect the usage behavior of wiki among the University staff, let’s take a look on the demographics information of University faculty staff participated in survey.

Dashboard #1 Demographics Info [[1]]

Visualisation Design

The above Tableau dashboard provides an interactive way to allow user to use Gender & WikiUser as Filtering options to select the info on University, PhD and Domain details.

Findings
In summary, there are a total of 913 University faculty staff participated in the survey. Some key demographics profile of the staff are:

• More male staff (57.5%) than female staff (42.5%)
• About 85% of the staff are Non-Wiki user
• About 88% of staff were from UOC University.
• Quite high percentage (40%) of the staff’s domain area are unknown (not indicated in the survey responses)

Staff Profile Dashboard

The following Tableau dashboard provides an interactive visualisation to further drill down to more details profile information in terms of Age Group by each Domain, Gender % for each domain, and also the academic position profile for each domain area.

Dashboard #2 Staff Profile Dashboard [[2]]

The Various Factors that Influence the Use of Wikipedia

Now we will analyse at a macro level the various factors that could influence the uses of Wikipedia among the University staff.

The following Tableau dashboard provides an interactive visualisation to examine the positive and negative factors that would affect the use of Wikipedia among the University staff in Higher Education .

Dashboard #3 Survey Analysis Dashboard [[3]]

Visualisation design

The above Tableau dashboard consists of a Heat Map that visualize the % of survey response scale for each survey category. Note that the % calculation is computed as % of Total across each category, that means the total % for each category should add up to 100%. In this case, we are able to identify the positive and negative factors (variables) that influence the behavior intention to use Wikipedia.

Upon selecting any of the categories in Heat Map, it provides the interactivity to allow user to drill down on the divergent bar chart at the bottom to look at the Likert scales for each survey question.

Findings

• 1) Positive factors (in terms of high response % of Strongly Agree + Agree) are:
  • Sharing Attitude (80.6%), Perceived Ease of Use (67%), Perceived Enjoyment (66.2%)
• 2) Poor (negative) factors (in terms of high response % of Disagree + Strongly Disagree) are:
  • Use Behavior (51.5%) and Profile 2.0 (51.3%)
• 3) Factors with more than 30% of Neutral responses
  • Perceived Usefulness, Quality, Social Image, Visibility, and Behavioral Intention
  • It’s observed that non-Wiki users seems to have more Neutral response in most survey categories as compared to Wiki user.
• 4) For Behavior Intention, 29.2% indicated positive response (SA + A), 31.6% indicated negative responses (D + SD), and majority of 35.2% stayed neutral opinion

Understanding on each measure that could influence the behavior intention to use Wikipedia

Next we will further investigate on each of the measures as below:

• User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology (Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment using wiki)
• Motivation factors to use Wikipedia
• The mindset / attitude on collaborative practice using wiki
• Perceived quality of information using wiki
• Social influence

The following three Qlik Sense dashboards provides an interactive visualisation to drill down into the relationship between various attributes (age, academic position, domain, current wiki users, survey questions) regards to the positive and negative response in each measure.

Dashboard #3 Survey Analysis Dashboard [[4]]

Visualisation design Three Qlik Sense dashboards were constructed to visualize more in depth analysis for each of the measure under investigation. Below are some of the insights to be discover through this visualisation:- - Any identification of variables (e.g. age, academic position, current wiki user etc) that could influence the behavior intention to use wiki - Detect any skeptical attitudes in university faculty regards using Wikipedia in class - Establish any relation to generational and disciplinary factors or any implicit conflict between the scientific academic culture and Wikipedia culture.

Findings o User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology (Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment using wiki)

- Worst average scale is Perceived Usefulness. Mostly form Adjunct staff (59 out of 81 saying disagree).

- Two PU Survey Question scored the most number of Disagree Response are PU1: The use of Wikipedia makes it easier for students to develop new skills. PU2: The use of Wikipedia improves students' learning Means the staff (especially the adjunct think that the use Wikipedia will not make it easier for students to develop new skills and also not likely to improves learning.

- Comments based on Age Group and Yrs of experience

o Motivation - Highly motivated was due to Experience, followed by Job Relevance, followed by Use Behavior - Questions with High number of Agree + Total Agree come from o JR1: My university promotes the use of open collaborative environments in the Internet o EXP3: I consult Wikipedia for personal issues o EXP2: I consult Wikipedia for other academic related issues

Worst in Motivation - Exp 4, Use 2, Exp 5 o EXP4: I contribute to Wikipedia (editions, revisions, articles improvement...) o EXP5: I use wikis to work with my students o USE2: I use Wikipedia as a platform to develop educational activities with students - Majority from Adjunct - Mostly Yrs, of experience < 20

o Quality o QU3: Articles in Wikipedia are comprehensive (25%) o QU5: I trust in the editing system of Wikipedia (22.6%) o QU4: In my area of expertise, Wikipedia has a lower quality than other educational resources (22.4)