ISSS608 2016-17 T1 Assign2 Ho Li Chin

From Visual Analytics and Applications
Revision as of 10:11, 26 September 2016 by Lichin.ho.2016 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1. Abstract

In this assignment, the interactive data exploration and the analysis techniques will be applied to discovery patterns in multivariate data.

2. Theme of Interest

In this assignment, the dataset that have been chosen for the analysis is “wiki4HE Data Set” (https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/wiki4HE).

The theme of interest is to explore the factors affecting the use of Wikipedia in Higher Education. Wiki technology emerged in higher education teaching and learning experiences as early as 1999 and is integrated into many courses for its ability to provide a collaborative environment for Academic staff and students.

The objective of this assignment is to understand the main factors that influence the teaching uses of Wikipedia among university faculty staff, and any of those factors have significant direct impact on the Behavioral Intention of adopting Wikipedia in higher education, for providing more effective and efficient methods to maximize the teaching and learning experience.

3. Examine the Survey Questions

In this section, we will first examine the survey questions in the dataset. The survey questions are categorized into respective broader category, and each category is linked to one construct measure for investigation. The following measures will be considered to further derive the investigation questions in next section for the purpose of the analysis.

Survey Question Category Survey Questions (Variables) Measures
Perceived Usefulness PU1: The use of Wikipedia makes it easier for students to develop new skills.

PU2: The use of Wikipedia improves students' learning
PU3: Wikipedia is useful for teaching User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology

User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology
Perceived Ease of Use PEU1: Wikipedia is user friendly

PEU2: It is easy to find in Wikipedia the information you seek PEU3: It is easy to add or edit information in Wikipedia

User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology
Perceived Enjoyment ENJ1: The use of Wikipedia stimulates curiosity

ENJ2: The use of Wikipedia is entertaining

User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology
Use behaviour USE1: I use Wikipedia to develop my teaching materials

USE2: I use Wikipedia as a platform to develop educational activities with students USE3: I recommend my students to use Wikipedia USE4: I recommend my colleagues to use Wikipedia USE5: I agree my students use Wikipedia in my courses

Motivation to use wiki
Experience EXP1: I consult Wikipedia for issues related to my field of expertise

EXP2: I consult Wikipedia for other academic related issues EXP3: I consult Wikipedia for personal issues EXP4: I contribute to Wikipedia (editions, revisions, articles improvement...) EXP5: I use wikis to work with my students

Motivation to use wiki
Job relevance JR1: My university promotes the use of open collaborative environments in the Internet

JR2: My university considers the use of open collaborative environments in the Internet as a teaching merit

Motivation to use wiki
Sharing attitude SA1: It is important to share academic content in open platforms

SA2: It is important to publish research results in other media than academic journals or books SA3: It is important that students become familiar with online collaborative environments

Collaborative Mindset / Attitude
Profile 2.0 PF1: I contribute to blogs

PF2: I actively participate in social networks PF3: I publish academic content in open platforms

Collaborative Mindset / Attitude
Quality QU1: Articles in Wikipedia are reliable

QU2: Articles in Wikipedia are updated
QU3: Articles in Wikipedia are comprehensive
QU4: In my area of expertise, Wikipedia has a lower quality than other educational resources
QU5: I trust in the editing system of Wikipedia

Perceived quality of wiki information
Social Image IM1: The use of Wikipedia is well considered among colleagues

IM2: In academia, sharing open educational resources is appreciated IM3: My colleagues use Wikipedia

Social Influence
Visibility VIS1: Wikipedia improves visibility of students' work

VIS2: It is easy to have a record of the contributions made in Wikipedia VIS3: I cite Wikipedia in my academic papers

Social Influence
Behavioral intention BI1: In the future I will recommend the use of Wikipedia to my colleagues and students

BI2: In the future I will use Wikipedia in my teaching activity Incentives

Intention to use wiki
Incentives INC1: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: a best practices guide

INC2: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: getting instruction from a colleague INC3: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: getting specific training INC4: To design educational activities using Wikipedia, it would be helpful: greater institutional recognition

Pedagogical Support to use wiki


4. Questions for Investigation

From the construct measures as defined in Section 2, following are the evolved list of questions for investigation. Different visualizations will be constructed ito present the data and to answer the questions as clearly as possible.

List of questions for investigation:

  • a) Relationship between the different measures that could influence the uses of Wikipedia among university faculty.
    • What are the positive factors and negative influence factors?
  • b) Understanding of each measure, as listed below, that could influence the behavior intention to use Wikipedia
    • User perception of technological innovations using wiki technology (Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment using wiki)
    • Motivation factors to use Wikipedia
    • The mindset / attitude on collaborative practice using wiki
    • Perceived quality of information using wiki
    • Social influence
  • c) Finally, putting all the measures as in part (2) together, we would like to find out:
    • Any identification of variables (e.g. age, academic position, current wiki user etc) that could influence the behavior intention to use wiki
    • Detect any skeptical attitudes in university faculty regards using Wikipedia in class and establish if they are related to generational and disciplinary factors or any implicit conflict between the scientific academic culture and Wikipedia culture.


Analysis of Wiki For Higher Education Dataset through Visualisation

Data Source

Data Preparation

Data Cleansing & Transformation

Visualisation to answer the questions under investigation

Understanding the Demographics Profiles of the University Faculty Staff

First, before we analyse on the survey variables that could affect the usage behavior of wiki among the University staff, let’s take a look on the demographics information of University faculty staff participated in survey.

Dashboard #1

Dashboard #1 Demographics Info [[1]]

Visualisation Design

The above Tableau dashboard provides an interactive way to allow user to use Gender & WikiUser as Filtering options to select the info on University, PhD and Domain details.

Findings
In summary, there are a total of 913 University faculty staff participated in the survey. Some key demographics profile of the staff are:

  • More male staff (57.5%) than female staff (42.5%)
  • About 85% of the staff are Non-Wiki user
  • About 88% of staff were from UOC University.
  • Quite high percentage (40%) of the staff’s domain area are unknown (not indicated in the survey responses)

Staff Profile Dashboard

The following dashboard provides an interactive visualisation to further drill down to more details profile information in terms of Age Group by each Domain, Gender % for each domain, and also the academic position profile for each domain area.

Dashboard #2

Dashboard #2 Staff Profile Dashboard [[2]]


Tools Used

Conclusion