Difference between revisions of "Staying Vigilant, Confronting Terrorism: Proposal"
Wx.tan.2013 (talk | contribs) |
Wx.tan.2013 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 153: | Line 153: | ||
# The bar chart at the bottom of the page shows the number of attacks that took place based on countries that have already been selected. By default, 3 countries will be selected. These countries have the highest number of attack count around the world and this is selected by default, as we assume that analysts will be interested to explore and analyze these countries. | # The bar chart at the bottom of the page shows the number of attacks that took place based on countries that have already been selected. By default, 3 countries will be selected. These countries have the highest number of attack count around the world and this is selected by default, as we assume that analysts will be interested to explore and analyze these countries. | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | [[File:Radar BubbleChart TeamVigilante.png|600px|center]] |
+ | || | ||
+ | # In the next phase of the exploration, data will be displayed based on the countries that analysts have selected previously. | ||
+ | # The radar chart shows the 6 different governance indicators that defines how well a country is governed. The closer the area is to the center of the chart, the less well governed the country is. Upon mouse-over of each area, one can also retrieve the exact values of each governance indicator. | ||
+ | # The bubble plot groups attacks based on 3 categories - country, target victim and political terror scale. By grouping based on country, one can better visualize the number of attacks that took place in each country and contrast it with the data presented in the radar chart. Secondly, by grouping based on target victims, one can also establish the most common targets of these terrorist attacks that took place. This will bring analysts further in the data exploration, especially if there are high numbers of attacks targeting at certain groups of people. Lastly, grouping by political terror scale allow the analysts to contrast the info with the radar chart. Also, by looking at the count of attacks in each scale, one can also identify interesting patterns. | ||
+ | # In the bubble plot, each bubble represents an attack. When user mouse-over each bubble, they can see more information about each attack. Due to technical limitations and to avoid excessive clutter on the page, only attacks that have resulted in more than 15 deaths will be shown. This is in conjunction with the assumption that analysts would be more interested to look at attacks that have caused great harm to the public. | ||
+ | # By looking at both charts, the analyst will then be able to compare and establish possible linkages between how well a country is governed and the number of terrorist attacks that took place in the country. As such, these 2 charts are placed side by side to assist the analyst in their data exploration. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 22:39, 13 November 2016
After much analysis and investigation on the data, our group feels that the previous storyboard we created will not allow people to find interesting insights. This is primarily because we realised that there is not much support from the data collected to show that the economic indicators in a country will lead to higher levels of terrorist attacks in a country. The relationship between a country's economy and the number of terrorist attacks could not be established. As such, we decided to change our storyboard to show more interesting insights, as shown in this proposal. If you are interested to look at our previous proposal, please refer back to Proposal Version 1.
The threat of terrorism is growing everyday and many countries, including Singapore, have taken steps to mitigate the risks of terrorism. In the National Day Rally 2016, PM Mr. Lee Hsien Loong mentioned that diplomats and security forces have been doing their job well but despite their efforts, it does not mean that terrorist attacks will not happen in Singapore. The recent attack that attempted to fire a rocket to hit Marina Bay Sands Area from Batam was successfully intervened but this signals to the country that the terrorism threat should not be taken lightly. In response to the growing terrorist threat, the SGSecure Movement was launched to prepare the public in the event of an attack. In recent years, there is a rise in research on terrorist organizations and the activities they have performed, regardless of scale, over the years. However, more still needs to be done to analyze past terrorist activities and gain insights from it easily so that all countries could better prepare for a worst case scenario.
In this project, we are interested to create a visualization that helps analysts perform the following:
- Identify the target victims of terrorist attacks across different countries
- Identify possible linkages between how well a country is governed and the number of terrorist attacks that occur in a country
- Compare how well a country is governed and the occurrence of terrorist attacks between different countries around the world
By conducting the analysis, it allows respective policy makers, government or intelligence agencies to better identify potential linkages between how well a country is governed and the potential for future terrorist attacks. If a link between how well a country is governed and the occurrence of terrorist attacks could be established, policy makers and government agencies can take steps to improve the political conditions/way in which their country is governed. By targeting at a potential root cause of terrorist attacks, it aims to reduce the number of terrorist attacks happening across different parts of the world.
In our analysis, we will only be using data within the year of 2000 - 2015. The rationale for the range of data selected is as follows:
- It does not provide strong relevance/insights for analysts to look at all the data in the past 45 years and attempt to predict activities of these terrorist organizations now/in the future. Due to rapid changes in the globalized world, a range of 15 years will be adequate to help analysts spot trends/patterns of terrorist activities.
- Due to limitations of the data collected on each country's governance indicators, the dataset only provides information from year 2000 - 2015.
- Due to technical limitations, loading past 45 years of data (156,773 records) into the application may cause it to become non-responsive and users may not be satisfied with the response rate. A range of 15 years (87,010 records) will yield just enough data for an insightful analysis and yet, does not sacrifice on the application's response rate.
The dataset for analysis will be retrieved from multiple databases, as elaborated below:
Dataset/Source | Data Attributes | Rationale Of Usage |
---|---|---|
(https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/using-gtd/) |
|
|
(http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worldwide-governance-indicators) |
|
|
(http://www.politicalterrorscale.org/Data/) |
|
|
Many visual and data analysts have made use of data collected from the Global Terrorism Database to visualize and understand the extent of terrorist attacks around the world. Some of their works include the following:
Related Works | What We Can Learn |
---|---|
|
|
| |
|
Other than looking at related works of others, we also reference and draw inspirations from interactive visualizations created by others. Some of these visualizations that we draw inspiration from, are as follows:
Reference of Other Interactive Visualization | What We Can Learn |
---|---|
| |
|
Proposed Layout | How Analyst Can Conduct Analysis |
---|---|
| |
| |
|
The following are some of the key technical challenges that we may face throughout the course of the project:
Key Technical Challenges | How We Propose To Resolve |
---|---|
| |
| |
| |
|
The following shows our project timeline for the completion of this project:
The following are some of the tools/technologies that we will be utilizing during the project:
- D3.js
- Chart.js
- Notepad++
- Adobe PhotoShop
- Marina Bay Attack Plot from Batam ‘Not to be Taken Lightly’ (http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/rocket-attack-plot-not-to-be-taken-lightly)
- National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). (2016). Global Terrorism Database [Data file]. Retrieved from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
- Worldwide Governance Indicators (http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/worldwide-governance-indicators)
- Political Terror Scale (http://www.politicalterrorscale.org/Data/)
- Educity (http://www.thiakx.com/educity/?loaded#introPage-Link)
- GED Viz - Visualizing Global Economic Relations (http://viz.ged-project.de/)
- D3.js (https://d3js.org/)
- Examples By Mike Bostock (https://bost.ocks.org/mike/example/)
- CSV to JSON Converter (http://www.convertcsv.com/csv-to-json.htm)
The following show the proposed storyboard that we designed during our brainstorming sessions:
The storyboard provides an overview of the various charts that we intend to employ in our web application. More information about each chart is indicated based on the labels present in the chart. Based on reasons of practicality, it is difficult to place all 3 charts in the same window and yet able to see all the information clearly. As such, when we draw our final storyboard, the charts are separated on 2 different pages. Users will be able to scroll between different charts by using their left/right arrow keys.
Feel free to comment to help us improve our project! (: