HeaderSIS.jpg

Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2017T2 Bare Code User Testing 2"

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 87: Line 87:
  
 
<h2>Overall:</h2>
 
<h2>Overall:</h2>
[[File: BareCodeUAT2.jpg| 600px | left]]
+
[[File: BareCodeUAT2.jpg| 600px | center]]
 +
 
  
 
<h2>Results:</h2>
 
<h2>Results:</h2>

Revision as of 16:23, 3 April 2018


link=IS480_Team_wiki%3A_2017T2_Bare_Code

HOME

ABOUT US

PROJECT OVERVIEW

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

DOCUMENTATION

WIREFRAME

PERSONA & SCENARIO

DIAGRAMS

USER TESTING

MEETING MINUTES


BareCode UAT.png BareCode UAT.png BareCode UAT.png BareCode UAT.png
UAT 1
UAT 2
UAT 3
UAT 4

Objectives

  • To obtain feedback on developed functions from intended users
  • To detect usability issues based on users’ behaviours
  • To improve MSL @ NP app based on UT results and feedback

Details:

Date: 13 February 2018
Time: 430PM - 715PM
Venue: Ngee Ann Polytechnic
Number of participants: 19 NP students + 1 Lecturer

Scope:

Student functions:

  • Login/Logout of Account
  • View and download learning resources
  • Quizzes
  • Learning Reflections

Lecturer Functions:

  • Upload & Create Learning Materials (Video & Notes)
  • Create a student into the list
  • Upload a class list
  • Setting Quizzes
  • Viewing Quiz Answers
  • View Quiz Scores
  • Setting Reflections
  • Viewing Reflections Answers
  • View Reflections Scores

Overall:

BareCodeUAT2.jpg


Results:

S/N Goals Results
1 Participants should be able to log in. Passed
2 Participants should be able to access the learning resources (video). Passed
3 Participants should be able to read the learning materials (notes). Passed
4 Participants should be able to attempt the quizzes. Passed
5 Participants should be able to view their quiz scores after submitting them. Passed
6 Participants should be able to type their reflections on the application. Passed

Other Comments :

S/N Comments
1 Participants expressed a preference for a landing page before a quiz.
2 Participants mentioned that options in quizzes did not look like options, but more like a static image.
3 “Notes” was interpreted as a section to jot down notes, rather than a section to retrieve learning materials.
4 UI is simple, but can be improved to include more colours.
5 Participants suggested to include transcript of video, accompanied with video screenshots in case of low data allowance.
6 Bigger fonts for titles
7 Use “Calendar” function to choose dates rather than enter them manually