IS480 Team wiki: 2016T2 Team Sirius User Tests
Revision as of 15:52, 13 January 2016 by Kathy.boey.2013 (talk | contribs)
User Test 1
We have recruited our product owner and sponsor from IDA as our participants.
Contents
User Test 1
Venue: IDA
Date: 30 Oct 2015, Friday
Time: 3.00pm
Duration: ~25 minutes
Number of Participant(s): 2
Objectives
- To gather feedback on usability of the user interface from existing users</l1>
- Identify usability issues user might face
Scope for User Testing 1
- Create an experiment</l1>
- Edit an existing experiment
- Start/Stop an experiment</l1>
- Preview an existing experiment
Participants
We have recruited our product owner and sponsor from IDA as our participants.
Goals and Results
S/N | Goals | Reached/Reached? |
---|---|---|
1 | Participants should be able complete task #1 without any guidance from our test facilitator | Goal partially reached. Both participants were confused about the process (navigating from page to page), unsure about what the inputs were for. |
2 | Participants should be able to edit an existing experiment | Goal reached. Both participants were able to complete the tasks. One of the participants had a lower rating and took a longer time to complete the task. |
3 | Participants should be able to understand the experiment results | Goal reached. Both participants were able to complete the tasks. However, both participants rated the usability as difficult as the labels were confusing. |
4 | Participants should able to find goals of from existing experiments | Goal reached. Both participants were able to complete the tasks. |
5 | Participants should be able to start and stop the experiment easily | Goal reached. Both participants were able to complete the tasks. |
Key Findings
Overall Findings Summary | ||
---|---|---|
Quantitative Analysis | When adding a new experiment, one participant was unsure whether to click on ‘load’ or ‘next’ button to proceed to the next step. | |
The participants were confused by the input for “jQuery code” and “CSS selector”. The participants does not understand what are these inputs for. | ||
Participants took a longer time to edit the existing experiment. | ||
The header of the result table was confusing. Participants find it hard to understand the result |