Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2016T1 Eureka Final Wiki"
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
| style="padding:0.1em; font-size:100%; border-top:0px solid #F5F5F5; background-color:#FFFFFF; text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="25%" | | | style="padding:0.1em; font-size:100%; border-top:0px solid #F5F5F5; background-color:#FFFFFF; text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="25%" | | ||
− | [[<font color="# | + | [[IS480 Team wiki: 2016T1 Eureka Mid Term Wiki|<font color="#318ba2" size=2 face="Century Gothic"><b><u>MAIN WIKI</u></b></font>]] |
| style="padding:0.1em; font-size:100%; border-top:0px solid #F5F5F5; background-color:#FFFFFF; text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="25%" | | | style="padding:0.1em; font-size:100%; border-top:0px solid #F5F5F5; background-color:#FFFFFF; text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="25%" | |
Revision as of 19:18, 10 April 2016
[[FINAL WIKI]] |
Contents
Project Progress Summary
Project Highlights
Project Challenges
As the company was located on Jurong Island, a secure location which requires security clearance to visit, we faced some degree of difficulty when arranging face-to-face meetings. As a result of this, most of the communication were done via e-mail and text messages and calls.
Although we were fortunate to receive upper management’s support for implementing our proposed solution, they delegated the task of coordinating our project to a lower level administrative staff. As a result of the lack of influence and commitment of the administrative staff to improve efficiency within the organisation, we faced several problems.
Our team has striven to mitigate these challenges by having having greater engagement of both the upper management and our sponsor as well frequently encouraging the administrative staff.
Project Management
Project Scope
Project Metrics
Project Risk
Technical Complexity
Quality of Product
Intermediate Deliverables
Stage | Specification | Modules |
---|---|---|
Project Management | Minutes | Team, Supervisor & Sponsor |
Metrics | Schedule Metrics | |
Bug Metrics | ||
Risk Management | Risk Management | |
Change Management | Change Management | |
Requirements | Problems | [Video] |
Market Research | Market Research | |
Analysis and Design | Use Case, ER Diagram & Architectural Diagram]] | Diagrams |
Prototype | Prototype | |
Technology Used | Technologies | |
Testing | User Test Plan | Test Plan |
User Testing 1 | UT1 | |
User Testing 2 | UT2 | |
User Testing 3 | UT3 | |
Trial Implementation | Trial | |
Handover | User Guide Video | [Admin] [Employee] |
Business Proposal | Click Here | |
Deployment Guide | Click Here | |
Handover Signoff | [Click Here] |
Quality
Deployment
Testing
Objectives |
---|
-Gather sponsor, pilot implementation company and relevant users’ feedback with regards to the heuristics and design of the existing functions of the current application |
Number of Users |
---|
-1 Sponsor -1 Sponsor |
Date |
---|
|
Full Documentation |
---|
|
Objectives |
---|
- Assess the usability of our application in the day-to-day lunch ordering process |
Number of Users |
---|
- Admin: 1 Participant |
Date |
---|
|
Full Documentation |
---|
|
Objectives |
---|
- Assess the usability of our application in the day-to-day lunch ordering process |
Number of Users |
---|
-1 Sponsor |
Date |
---|
|
Full Documentation |
---|
|
Objectives |
---|
- Assess the usability of our application in the day-to-day lunch ordering process |
Number of Users |
---|
-2 Lunch In-Charge from pilot implementation company (Eastman Chemical) -10 Employees from pilot implementation company (Eastman Chemical) |
Date |
---|
|
Full Documentation |
---|
|