IS480 Team wiki: 2015T2 EcoCo User Testing 3
Revision as of 21:43, 20 March 2016 by Gwtay.2013 (talk | contribs)
Personas and Scenario | Diagrams | Meeting Minutes | Testing |
Contents
User Testing 3 Details
- Date: 19 March 2016
- Venue: National Library, informatics Lab
User Testing 3 Objective
- Determine if user interface is intuitive after making the changes from UT2
- Discover usability problem which users might face after changes from UT2
Click Here To View Study Design Document
Scope of UT 3
- User
- Register for an account/Login via Facebook
- Update user profile
- Submit "As A Consumer" Eco Action
- View news
- View events
- View Eco Action history
- View Reward Catalogue
- Claim reward
- Logout of account
User Testing 3 Participant
- Eco Singapore Volunteers
User Testing 3 Study Task
- The participants were asked to complete the following as a User:
- Login via Facebook
- Edit his Profile Page
- Submit an Eco Action
- View Actions History
- Claim a reward
- Check status of reward claimed
- View Events in the Event page
- View News in the News page
- Logout of account.
User Testing 3 Feedback
As A User | Likes | Dislikes |
---|---|---|
User Interface | 1. Overall look of the site is appealing |
1. The font is very disliked 2. Events are hard to read. 3. Fonts make the words look very compact. |
Functionality | 1. It's really a one stop solution to saving the environment. 2. Good to have so many Eco actions that can be done at home. |
1. A lot of scrolling when selecting Country for profile setup. 2. When looking at news, there is too much scrolling. 3. When looking at events, there is also too much scrolling. 4. The events are not listed in order, and they are randomly listed. |
As An Admin | Likes | Dislikes |
---|---|---|
User Interface | 1. Overall look of the site is appealing |
1. The font is not appealing 2. Events and News hard to read. |
Functionality | 1. It's really a one stop solution to saving the environment. 2. Good to have so many Eco actions that can be done at home. |
1. When rejecting an Eco Action, the user will not know why his action is rejected. 2. When a user has submitted an action with the wrong input, Admin is not able to edit it and has to reject it. |
Changes Implemented
Changes Made | Remarks |
---|---|
Admin can leave a remark when rejecting an action | |
Admin can now edit the user's submission |