HeaderSIS.jpg

Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2013T2 Tappers/Documentation/User Testing"

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 34: Line 34:
 
<div style="font-size: 20px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Feedback</font></div>
 
<div style="font-size: 20px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Feedback</font></div>
 
[[Image: Features4.png | 1000px | center]]
 
[[Image: Features4.png | 1000px | center]]
 +
 +
<h3>Heuristic Testing </h3>
 +
<h4>Heuristics and Severity Ratings</h4>
 +
{| class="wikitable centered"
 +
!Heuristics
 +
!Severity Ratings
 +
|-
 +
|style="vertical-align:text-top"|
 +
 +
1. Visibility of system status
 +
 +
2. Match between system and the real world
 +
 +
3. User control and freedom
 +
 +
4. Consistency and standards
 +
 +
5. Error prevention
 +
 +
6. Recognition rather than recall
 +
 +
7. Flexibility and efficiency of use
 +
 +
8. Aesthetic and minimalist design
 +
 +
9. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors
 +
 +
10. Help and documentation
 +
 +
Not related to any heuristic
 +
 +
|style="vertical-align:text-top"|
 +
 +
0 = Not a real usability problem
 +
 +
1 = Cosmetic problem only
 +
 +
2 = Minor usability problem
 +
 +
3 = Major usability problem
 +
 +
4 = Usability catastrophe
 +
 +
|-
 +
|}

Revision as of 03:53, 16 February 2014

Tappers banner.jpg
Home The Team Project Overview Project Management Project Documentation Learning Outcomes


Design & Prototype Diagrams User Testing Resources Meeting Minutes


User Testing

User Testing 1
Date : 28 January
Venue: Lien Centre for Social Innovation, SMU Admin Building, Level 9
Users: Jenny HUQ, Shirley PONG, Jared THAM, Mumtaz
2014-01-28 10.13.26.jpg 2014-01-28 10.21.48.jpg 2014-01-28 10.21.51.jpg 2014-01-28 10.21.58.jpg

Feedback
Features4.png

Heuristic Testing

Heuristics and Severity Ratings

Heuristics Severity Ratings

1. Visibility of system status

2. Match between system and the real world

3. User control and freedom

4. Consistency and standards

5. Error prevention

6. Recognition rather than recall

7. Flexibility and efficiency of use

8. Aesthetic and minimalist design

9. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors

10. Help and documentation

Not related to any heuristic

0 = Not a real usability problem

1 = Cosmetic problem only

2 = Minor usability problem

3 = Major usability problem

4 = Usability catastrophe