Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2013T2 Tappers/Documentation/User Testing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Mtphung.2011 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<div style="font-size: 20px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Feedback</font></div> | <div style="font-size: 20px; font-family:Arial; background: #8A740C; padding:16px; font-weight:bold; line-height:0.2em;"><font color = "white">Feedback</font></div> | ||
[[Image: Features4.png | 1000px | center]] | [[Image: Features4.png | 1000px | center]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3>Heuristic Testing </h3> | ||
+ | <h4>Heuristics and Severity Ratings</h4> | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable centered" | ||
+ | !Heuristics | ||
+ | !Severity Ratings | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="vertical-align:text-top"| | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. Visibility of system status | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. Match between system and the real world | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. User control and freedom | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4. Consistency and standards | ||
+ | |||
+ | 5. Error prevention | ||
+ | |||
+ | 6. Recognition rather than recall | ||
+ | |||
+ | 7. Flexibility and efficiency of use | ||
+ | |||
+ | 8. Aesthetic and minimalist design | ||
+ | |||
+ | 9. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10. Help and documentation | ||
+ | |||
+ | Not related to any heuristic | ||
+ | |||
+ | |style="vertical-align:text-top"| | ||
+ | |||
+ | 0 = Not a real usability problem | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1 = Cosmetic problem only | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2 = Minor usability problem | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3 = Major usability problem | ||
+ | |||
+ | 4 = Usability catastrophe | ||
+ | |||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |} |
Revision as of 03:53, 16 February 2014
Home | The Team | Project Overview | Project Management | Project Documentation | Learning Outcomes |
Design & Prototype | Diagrams | User Testing | Resources | Meeting Minutes |
User Testing
User Testing 1
Date : 28 January
Venue: Lien Centre for Social Innovation, SMU Admin Building, Level 9
Users: Jenny HUQ, Shirley PONG, Jared THAM, Mumtaz
Feedback
Heuristic Testing
Heuristics and Severity Ratings
Heuristics | Severity Ratings |
---|---|
1. Visibility of system status 2. Match between system and the real world 3. User control and freedom 4. Consistency and standards 5. Error prevention 6. Recognition rather than recall 7. Flexibility and efficiency of use 8. Aesthetic and minimalist design 9. Help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors 10. Help and documentation Not related to any heuristic |
0 = Not a real usability problem 1 = Cosmetic problem only 2 = Minor usability problem 3 = Major usability problem 4 = Usability catastrophe |