Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2012T1 One-hit Wonder Final Wiki Usability Study"
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
To find out the effectiveness of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for users to create employment documents using our application as compared to other tools like Microsoft Word. | To find out the effectiveness of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for users to create employment documents using our application as compared to other tools like Microsoft Word. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{| style="background-color: transparent;" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="1" | {| style="background-color: transparent;" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
|- style="background-color: #7D9C9F; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; font-size: 15px;" | |- style="background-color: #7D9C9F; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; font-size: 15px;" | ||
Line 124: | Line 117: | ||
+ | '''Company:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | To find out the effectiveness and value of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for companies to find suitable candidates as compared to other channels (e.g Other job portals, newspaper, company website etc) | ||
{| style="background-color: transparent;" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="1" | {| style="background-color: transparent;" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" border="1" | ||
|- style="background-color: #7D9C9F; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; font-size: 15px;" | |- style="background-color: #7D9C9F; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; font-size: 15px;" |
Revision as of 17:00, 28 November 2012
Usability Study: User Testing 2
Usability Study Recap |
HEURISTIC EVALUATION
In order to find out the usability of Flauntpage, we conducted a Heuristic Evaluation.
This HE focuses mainly on 8 Usability Heuristics focus points as follows:
- Be consistent
- Focus on tasks
- Provide feedback
- Follow established conventions
- Speak the user’s language
- Prevent errors
- Minimize clicks
- Avoid scrolling
Refer to detailed analysis of Heuristic Evaluation here
USER TESTING 1
Refer to detailed analysis of UT1 here
Difference between UT1 & UT2
UT1 | UT2 | |
Objectives | To ensure that FlauntPage is performing well on the server with no major bugs and errors caught in the process. | To find out the effectiveness of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for users to create employment documents using our application as compared to other tools like Microsoft Word.
To find out the effectiveness and value of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for companies to find suitable candidates as compared to other channels (e.g Other job portals, newspaper, company website etc) |
Execution | Guided.
Users assigned a role and given detailed test cases with guided steps to follow. Users rated difficulty and gave comments for each task completed. |
Unguided.
Part I: Users assigned a role and given a resume template to create a replica of the resume using Microsoft words and FlauntPage. Timings will taken for creation of documents and we later observed users behavior when using FlauntPage. |
UT2 Objective |
Execution Period: 5th November 2012 - 7th November 2012 (3 days)
Job Seeker:
To find out the effectiveness of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for users to create employment documents using our application as compared to other tools like Microsoft Word.
Job Seeker | |
Total no. of testers | 16 |
Browser used | Google Chrome & Firefox |
Age range | 18 - 30 |
No. of testers assigned difficult level | 10 |
No. of testers assigned easy level | 6 |
Company:
To find out the effectiveness and value of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for companies to find suitable candidates as compared to other channels (e.g Other job portals, newspaper, company website etc)
Company | |
Total no. of testers | 2 |
Browser used | Google Chrome |
Company name | Richemont |
Procedure |
Results & Analysis |