HeaderSIS.jpg

Difference between revisions of "IS480 Team wiki: 2012T1 One-hit Wonder Final Wiki Usability Study"

From IS480
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 60: Line 60:
  
 
'''Difference between UT1 & UT2'''
 
'''Difference between UT1 & UT2'''
{| style="background-color: transparent;" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="1"
+
{| style="background-color: transparent;" width="80%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" border="1"
 
|- style="background-color: #7D9C9F; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; font-size: 15px;"
 
|- style="background-color: #7D9C9F; font-weight: bold; text-align: center; font-size: 15px;"
 
|  
 
|  
| width="40%" | UT1
+
| width="30%" | UT1
| width="40%" | UT2
+
| width="30%" | UT2
 
|-
 
|-
 
| style="background-color: #BDD8DA; font-weight: bold;" | Objectives
 
| style="background-color: #BDD8DA; font-weight: bold;" | Objectives

Revision as of 16:22, 28 November 2012

HomeOHW.png Home

Project Progress

Project Management

Project Quality

Usability Study

Reflection

Slides and Poster

Usability Study: User Testing 2

Usability Study Recap

HEURISTIC EVALUATION

In order to find out the usability of Flauntpage, we conducted a Heuristic Evaluation.

This HE focuses mainly on 8 Usability Heuristics focus points as follows:

  1. Be consistent
  2. Focus on tasks
  3. Provide feedback
  4. Follow established conventions
  5. Speak the user’s language
  6. Prevent errors
  7. Minimize clicks
  8. Avoid scrolling

Refer to detailed analysis of Heuristic Evaluation here


USER TESTING 1

Refer to detailed analysis of UT1 here


Difference between UT1 & UT2

UT1 UT2
Objectives To ensure that FlauntPage is performing well on the server with no major bugs and errors caught in the process. To find out the effectiveness of FlauntPage and how convenient it is for users to create employment documents using our application as compared to other tools like Microsoft Word.
Execution Guided Unguided


UT2 Objective



Procedure



Results & Analysis