Policy And Planning Proposal 2
Contents
PROBLEM & MOTIVATION
Problem Background:
With Singapore’s growing population and limited resources, she faces many pressing challenges for progressive development and economic growth. These challenges span across housing affordability, rising healthcare, aging population, education/income inequality, and low birth rates. For Singapore to continue progressing, it is imperative that the government continues to take proactive measures to plan and utilise its resources effectively. In this fashion, we strive to use visual analytics to help uncover some of the cracks in and opportunities in Singapore’s social demographic to assist the government in sharpening its current policies and to look into future plans. This is well in line with the government’s effort of making socially relevant data public to encourage innovation and discovery.
Motivation:
With the government's strong support and push for open source innovation, we felt that this is a key area that we could utilise our skills in bringing value to society through informing the public and assisting decision makers with planning. Furthermore, with the government's push towards a smart nation, there are increasing data sets available with reasonably high dimention that can allow us to get insights if visualised properly.
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The key objectives we strive to achieve in this project cover two key processes of planning and policy making - Problem identification and Root cause analysis.
For each of these areas we have targeted to achieve the following:
Problem Identification:
- Provide a high level view of social demographics to allow broad understanding and awareness of data.
- Provide complimentary high level charts that show corresponding demographics of interest to allow identification of desirable/undesirable trends.
- Provide high level filters and interactive view modes to allow users to gather insights from a time based visualisation.
Root Cause Analysis (Identify Probable Correlations, not necessariyly causation):
- Provide precise interactive charts to allow further exploration of identified problems.
- Provide relevant filters and customizable views to allow users to identify key factors that might be contributing to the problem.
SELECTED DATABASE
The Data Sets we will be using for our analysis and for our application is listed below:
Dataset/Source | Data Attributes | Rationale Of Usage |
---|---|---|
(2000 - 2019, June) |
|
This dataset covers a good time series from 2000-2019 and the breakdown by subzone/planning area allows it to serve as the base platform to integrating with other population data sets that are grouped by subzone/planning area as well. From here, we can also get a good view of Singapore’s residential distribution by gender and age group that might give us a few initial findings that help for further investigation with the help of complimentary data sets. |
(2000, 2010, 2015) |
Contains the following attributes by Planning Area:
|
This data adds a very rich level of dimensionality on top of the residential data as mentioned above. However, it only covers limited points in time and so we intend to use this data separately for more deep time static analysis. Also, as this data is very rich, we hope that it can further serve as a bridge to more abstract but complementary data. |
(1960 - 2018, annual) |
|
This data set gives quite good coverage on the number of births by different dimentions i.e. ethnicity, age group, educational background of parents. This will be helpful in helping us bridge this data set with the other population data sets to explore Singapore’s Birthrate problems in greater detail. |
(1984 - 2018) |
|
This data helps to give a high level view on the hospitals of singapore and how many admissions they had each year. It will be useful to integrate this with the population data set to see how taxed each hospital is in caring for different age groups through the years. |
We will be using these data sets as our main inputs. However, we are still open to add complimentary data sets to further enhance the quality insights attained from our visualisation.
BACKGROUND SURVEY
To begin, we explored current charts that were used to visualise the key areas that we defined to explore (e.g. inequality, urban planning, geo-plots).
This is a summary of the more interesting visualisations we found:
Reference of Other Interactive Visualization | Learning Point |
---|---|
Title: Income distribution by country over the years
|
Learning Points:
|
Title: Changing Ranks of States by Congressional Representation |
Learning Points:
|
Title: Interactive map visualization |
Learning Points:
|
Title: Bricks Map |
Learning Points:
|
Title: Circular Network Diagram
|
Learning Points:
|
BRAINSTORMING SESSIONS
From our initial survey above, we have internalised some of the models and these are some of the ideas we came up with in our Brainstorming sessions:
1. Income Distribution By Subzone Planning Areas
The above listed chart or its modified variation will be used to describe the income distribution by the planning area or subzone.
These are the respective features of the chart:
- X-Axis: % of the population group
- Y-Axis income group
- User can use the a drop down list to check the different years’ income distribution
- The data will be formed into line chart histogram
- A Singapore average income and world poverty / average lines as the reference to help the user to understand the corresponding planning zone income position among world or entire Singapore
- The small map will show the the related region of the selected planning area.
2. Horizontal Network Diagram to view relationships between different dimentions
The above listed chart or its modified variation will be used to describe the redistribution for 2 or more metrics (E.g. Income/housing type).
The User can use drop down selector to change the parameters for the chart. This would help him to find the pattern of the different parameters.
Eg Did the enough HDB flat have been prepared for low income people?
3. Rank Change Chart
This chart helps to show rank changes and progression especially within a smaller set of data, i.e. census data 2000,2010,2015.
It would help users get a quick idea of how different planning areas or subzones fared in different social demographic categories.
This would then allow users to pinpoint specific cases that are surprising/desirable/undesirable and then proceed to do the necessary precise investigation from there.
4. Interactive Radius Summary Chart
This chart follows the same concept of the "5 minute distance" radius to dynamically calculate the corresponding demographics of the population within the radius.
Using this idea, planners will be able to dynamically set a radius to check the demographics of the nearby populace with greater detail using filters and categorical charts.
This graph brings in a new dynamic way of precise exploration to see the potential usage of facilities like common spaces, hospitals, and even parks.
5. Bricks Map With Simplified Social Demographics
This will serve as the core geo-plot for our users to keep in touch with the geographic nature of analysing Singapore.
With the help of different legends and simplified demographic classes, we will be able to give the user the relevant
time series data for them to better appreciate the context and usefulness of the other charts.
PROPOSED STORYBOARD (PAPER PROTOTYPE)
Below is the proposed story board for our project:
Storyboard | Insights / Comments |
---|---|
Title: DASHBOARD 1 - Home View (Helicopter View Exploration) |
|
Title: DASHBOARD 2 - Social Demographic Investigator |
|
Title: DASHBOARD 2 - Family and Birth Rate Investigator |
|
Title: DASHBOARD 3 - Healthcare Investigator |
|
TECHNOLOGY USED
These are the current technologies we have shortlisted that might be useful for the respective steps of the project,
we will be using the most feasible of these options or adding on others if necessary:
CHALLENGES, RISK ASSESMENT AND MITIGATION
Challenges | Mitigation Plan |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPOSED TIMELINE
This timeline shows the breakdown of tasks leading up to the project milestones. This timeline shows the progress as of 1 Mar 2020.
COMMENTS AND FEEDBACK
Feel free to leave us some comments so that we can improve!
No. | Name | Date | Comments |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Insert your name here | Insert date here | Insert comment here |
2. | Insert your name here | Insert date here | Insert comment here |
3. | Insert your name here | Insert date here | Insert comment here |