IS428 AY2019-20T2 Assign LU ZHIMAO

From Visual Analytics for Business Intelligence
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Project Motivation

Project Objectives

Data Preparation

Every two years, SMU Libraries conducts a comprehensive survey in which faculty, students and staff have the opportunity to rate various aspects of our services. The survey provides SMU Libraries with input to help enhance existing services and to anticipate emerging needs of SMU faculty, students and staff.

In 2018, the library survey was conducted in February.

Selection of Graphs used in Data Visualization

Graph Type Reasoning Picture
Likert Scale They are one of the most reliable ways to measure opinions, perceptions and Behaviours. It is used to an analysis survey question that uses a 5 or 7-point scale, in our Survey Data it uses 7-point scale and it referred to as a satisfaction scale, that ranges from Low (represented by 1) to High 7 (represented by 7).
KPI Performance Chart The KPI chart is used to, at a quick glance, give information about the current performance of the library. KPIs can be used to track the performance of the library against importance. They can provide a management tool for gaining insight and decision making. For our library survey data analysis is to identify the gaps between the importance and performance and in this case, both indicators are set by the survey responders. By looking at the gap we are able to identify if the library services currently under user's expectation or achieved user's expectation.
Vertical Bar Chart Use vertical column charts to display ordinal variables. For Net Promoter Score, it arranges ordinal categories from left to right so readers can view the sequence accordingly.
Horizontal Bar Chart Use horizontal bar charts to display nominal variables like Question ID. It allows arranging Question ID in a list from top to bottom and in a horizontal manner.
Population Pyramid Chart For Population Pyramid chart, breaks down SMU population into positions such as Undergraduate, Postgraduate, Staff and Faculty. For this assignment, you'll find the left side of the pyramid graphing the LKS population and the right side of the pyramid displaying the KGC population.

Survey DashBoard Overview Information

Survey Summary

Picture Number Description & Analysis
1
Screenshot (4).png
  • It is clear that majority of the law students use Kwa Geok Choo Library (KGC) more often than Li Ka Shing (LKS) while Li Ka Shing library host more students from the Business School.
  • We can see that the majority of the school population opt for Li Ka Shing library over Kwa Geok Choo library. This is probably due to the fact that LKS is located in the middle of the school compound and right next to campus green, making it more accessible for students as compared to KGC which is located at the far end of school with no sheltered walkway.
  • LKS should allocate more books catered for the rest of the students while KGC can focus more law books which may come in handy. By allocating their services, can improve reputation.
2
Likert scale promoters.jpg
  • Using a Likert Scale to represent the Net Promoters Score where
    • Blue represents ratings 9 and 10 (Promoters)
    • Grey represents ratings 7 and 8 (Passive)
    • Orange represents ratings 6 and below (Detractors)
    • We can see that Faculty has the greatest number of promotors with Postgraduates following behind while Staff and Undergraduate student has the least promotors when it comes to recommending library services to other students.
    • Since undergraduate students comprise of the majority usage of LKS and being the ones who use it daily, LKS should focus on improving their services. In SMU majority of the population are come from undergraduate students, if the library wants to increase the Net Promoter Score they should pay more attention to undergraduate students.
3 row 3 cell 2
4 row 4 cell 2

Gap Analysis Explanation

Summary

  • The highlight table shows the percentage breakdown of rating for both importance and performance for each group – Undergraduate, Postgraduate, Staff and Faculty.
  • Conducting a gap analysis where we take the Performance minus the Importance to find the gap between the importance of the question to them and compare it to how the library performs.
  • Since Importance is defined as how important it is to that individual and performance is defined as how well the library is performing in that area.
  • We will take the difference between these two, to measure how well the library is performing when compared to the level of importance held to them.
  • If the gap analysis turns out positive, it means that performance has exceeded importance. If it turns out negative, it means that performance has not met the same ranking as importance. And this is one key aspect the library should look at when improving their services.
  • I will be picking out 1 major change in each group for each category – Undergraduate, Postgraduate, Staff and Faculty and the rest can be viewed on Tableau Public.

Undergraduate

Gap Analysis

Picture Number Description & Analysis
1 Category: Communication
Screenshot (9).png
  • Under this category, question 2 has been identified to have the biggest gap identified.
  • For ranking 7 the importance is held at 31.49% while performance is only up to 20.84%, which shows a gap of -10.65%. This gap is significantly larger than the other 2 questions in the same category.
  • Since the question is asking about if the library website provides useful information and base on the answers answered by undergraduates, we can clearly infer that library does not provide enough information. In order to improve this segment, the library should look into the information provided on the library website and adjust according to suit student needs.
2 Category: Service Delivery
Screenshot (8).png
  • For Question 11, through the gap analysis, we can see that the library is underperforming in 3 rankings, where performance did not hit the importance level.
  • Out of the 3 rankings that are underperforming, the library ranked especially low under the category 7.
  • Importance for this question is rated quite high up the scale, at close to 40% and yet the library is only performing up to less than 23%. Since the question is asking if the items I'm looking for on the library shelves are usually there and based on the answers we can understand that the library does not provide enough books for students. Or misplacing of the items may lead to current issue too.
3 Facilities and Equipment
Screenshot (10).png
  • Question 14, through the gap analysis where performance is below importance by 53.49%.
  • This shows that the library is not providing sufficient studying areas for undergraduates to study in since the performance for it is rated way below the importance level.
4 Information Resource
Screenshot (11).png
  • For question 22, we can see that 39.40% rated a high for importance and 27.65% rated a high for performance.
  • Through this gap analysis, we can see that the library is underperforming by -11.75% when comparing it against the importance ranking.
  • The question is asking if the course-specific resources meet my learning needs since it shows a negative gap which means the library unable to provide enough course resources for the undergraduate which may affect the learning experience for undergraduate. Therefore, it definitely is one of the key important areas that the library should look into.

Postgraduate

Picture Number Description & Analysis
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Faculty

Picture Number Description & Analysis
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Staff

Picture Number Description & Analysis
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Data Reference