|
|
| (24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | | | |
| − | <!--Header-->
| |
| − |
| |
| − | {|style="background-color:#0B2161; color:#343436; padding: 10 0 10 0;" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" valign="top" border="0" |
| |
| − | | style="padding:0.2em; font-size:100%; background-color:#0B2161; text-align:center; color:#121313" width="10%" |
| |
| − | [[IS428_AY2019-20T2_Assign_YIP_JIAN_MING |<font color="#FACC2E" size=4 face="Arial">Undergraduate</font>]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | | style="background:none;" width="1%" |
| |
| − | | style="padding:0.2em; font-size:100%; background-color:#0B2161; border-bottom:0px solid #3D9DD7; text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="10%" |
| |
| − | [[IS428_AY2019-20T2_Assign_YIP_JIAN_MING_Postgraduate |<font color="#FACC2E" size=4 face="Arial">Postgraduate</font>]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | | style="background:none;" width="1%" |
| |
| − | | style="padding:0.2em; font-size:100%; background-color:#0B2161; border-bottom:0px solid #3D9DD7; text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="10%" |
| |
| − | [[IS428_AY2019-20T2_Assign_YIP_JIAN_MING_Faculty |<font color="#FACC2E" size=4 face="Arial">Faculty</font>]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | | style="background:none;" width="1%" |
| |
| − | | style="padding:0.2em; font-size:100%; background-color:#0B2161; border-bottom:0px solid #3D9DD7; text-align:center; color:#F5F5F5" width="10%" |
| |
| − | [[IS428_AY2019-20T2_Assign_YIP_JIAN_MING_Staff |<font color="#FACC2E" size=4 face="Arial">Staff</font>]]
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | <strong>Participant Distribution</strong>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:UndergradParticipation.png|500px]][[File:Undergrad2.png|500px]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <strong>Insights</strong>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | For undergraduate, most of the participants were from business school, went to the library weekly and used library resources weekly.
| |
| − | Having filtered by Information systems students, we can see that the daily visits have dropped in comparison to weekly visits. Also, as undergraduate students progress from year 1-4 their participation in the survey decreases. This could be due the Information Systems students’ dwindling use of library services resulting in them not wanting to participate in the survey.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | However, when we filter by Law school
| |
| − | students, we see that daily visits are dominant. Participation in the survey also holds strong over the years.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <strong>Recommendations</strong>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Library might want to think of ways of engaging Information Systems students. Possibly by having programming related events in the library.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <strong>Stated Preference vs Revealed Preference</strong>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[File:Undergrad3.png|500px|frame|center]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <strong>Insights</strong>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | For undergraduate, most of the participants were from business school, went to the library weekly and used library resources weekly.
| |
| − | Having filtered by Information systems students, we can see that the daily visits have dropped in comparison to weekly visits. Also, as undergraduate students progress from year 1-4 their participation in the survey decreases. This could be due the Information Systems students’ dwindling use of library services resulting in them not wanting to participate in the survey.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | However, when we filter by Law school
| |
| − | students, we see that daily visits are dominant. Participation in the survey also holds strong over the years.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | <strong>Recommendations</strong>
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Library might want to think of ways of engaging Information Systems students. Possibly by having programming related events in the library.
| |
