SMT201 AY2019-20T1 EX2 Lee Jung Jae

From Geospatial Analytics for Urban Planning
Revision as of 19:31, 10 November 2019 by Jungjae.lee.2015 (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Part I: A map layout with four views showing Gombak (Roads, Natural Features, Buildings and Elevation)

PART 1 FINAL.png

Roads

Buildings

Natural Features

Elevation model

Part II: A map layout with four views showing Proximity to Gombak Roads, Natural Features, Buildings and Slope

PART 2 FINAL.png

Roads Proximity

Natural Features Proximity

Buildings Proximity

Slope Proximity

Part 3: Criterion Scores of Each Factor Layers

Among all the criteria standardisation techniques, Min-Max technique will be apply to standardize the four raster layers from Part 2 to derive their criterion score.

MapLayout3.png

Let X be the value.
The formula of Min-Max technique is [(X - Min) / (Max - Min)].

Criterion Score for Roads

Formula (in meters): 1 - [(X - 0) / (743.303 - 0)]
The higher the standardized value the nearer it is to the existing service roads and tracks.
The reason why there is a 1 subtracting Min-Max formula is to inverse the standardized value. The existing Min-Max technique will give a standardized value where the higher the standardized value, the further it is to the existing service roads and tracks. However, the decision factor for accessibility is to have the selected site close to existing service roads and tracks.

Criterion Score for Buildings

Formula (in meters): (X - 0) / (838.466 - 0)
The higher the standardized value, the further it is away from the buildings.

Criterion Score for Natural Features

Formula (in meters): (X - 0) / (863.669 - 0)
The higher the standardized value, the further it is away from forested land, park and water.

Criterion Score for Slope

Formula (in degrees): 1 - [(X - 0) / (36.419 - 0)]
The higher the standardized value, the lower the degree of the slope.
The reason why there is a 1 subtracting Min-Max formula is to inverse the standardized value. The existing Min-Max technique will give a standardized value where the higher the standardized value, the higher the degree of the slope. However, the decision factor for economic is the selected site should avoid steep slope.

Part 4: Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) Input Matrix & Result Report

AHP-1.png
AHP-2.png

Based on the AHP input matrix and result report above, health risk factor, accessibility factor, natural conservation factor and economic factor have AHP of 40.6%, 29.8%, 23.1% and 6.5%. Health risk factor is the most important factor when considering the place to build CDQC. This is because CDQC is to isolate infected people away from healthy population. Accessibility factor is more important than the other two factors (natural conservation factor and economic factor) because in times of need, time is key to save a life. With CDQC being build close to existing roads and tracks, it can reduce cost to build additional roads. Natural conservation factor is more important than economic factor because infectious diseases may spread through air or water and may cause mutation to trees in the park and forest. Also, people may visit such places for tranquility. Last but not least, economic factor should be considered when building CDQC. If the area has steep slope, there is more cost involved to reduce the steepness before building CDQC.

Part 5: The Suitability Land Lot(s)

MapLayout4.png