Difference between revisions of "SMT201 AY2019-20T1 EX1 Linus Cheng Xin Wei"

From Geospatial Analytics for Urban Planning
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
 
<br>[[File:Proportion distribution 2010.png|425px]]<br>
 
<br>[[File:Proportion distribution 2010.png|425px]]<br>
  
=== Q2b) 2018 Proportion Aged 65+ ===
+
=== Q2b) 2018 Proportion Aged 65 > ===
  
 
<br>[[File:Proportion, 2018.png|850px]]<br>
 
<br>[[File:Proportion, 2018.png|850px]]<br>

Revision as of 20:42, 15 September 2019

Q1) Thematic Mapping

Q1a) Using school information from data.gov.sg, prepare a thematic map showing the distribution of public education institution by school types such as primary, secondary, etc.

This thematic map was built by geocoding the addresses and postal codes. I chose to give the same color to all the school types to signify equal importance between them, as someone that is searching for this information might be parents with child, who are looking for areas to start their family. To further enhance this map, I split the area by region, so viewers can easily visualize where education clusters are. I chose pastel colors to as it is light on the viewer eyes, as well as enabling the red points to stand out.


School Distribution,2019.png

Q1b) Using road GIS data of LTA, prepare a thematic map showing the hierarchy of road network system of Singapore such as expressway, major road, minor road, etc.


Road Hierachy,2019.png

Q1c) Using master plan landuse GIS data from data.gov.sg, prepare a thematic map showing 2014 Master Plan Landuse.


Planned Landuse, 2014, compressed.png

Q2) Choropleth Mapping

Q2a) 2010 Population Aged 65 >


Absolute, 2010.png


Absolute distribution 2010.png

Q2a) 2018 Population Aged 65 >


Absolute, 2018.png


Absolute distribution 2018.png

Q2b) 2010 Proportion Aged 65 >


Proportion, 2010.png


Proportion distribution 2010.png

Q2b) 2018 Proportion Aged 65 >


Proportion, 2018.png


Proportion distribution 2018.png

Q2C) Percentage Change From 2010 and 2018


Percentage Change, comparison between 2010 and 2018.png


Percentage distribution.png