Difference between revisions of "SMT201 AY2019-20G1 Ex2 Lim Shen Jie"

From Geospatial Analytics for Urban Planning
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
 
[[File:LSJ AHP column totals.JPG|800px|thumb|center|Resulting weightage]]
 
[[File:LSJ AHP column totals.JPG|800px|thumb|center|Resulting weightage]]
 
==== Description ====  
 
==== Description ====  
1. Buildings - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method. <br/>  
+
1. Health Risk - It is the most important factor to take into consideration as this will affect people staying the area, thus it is scored very highly as compared to the other 3 factors. <br/>  
2. Natural - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method.<br/>
+
2. Accessibility - It is the second most important factor together with slope angle. Accessibility to the site would affect the cost required to transport the construction tools and materials for the new building. Making it cost-effective would be important.<br/>
3. Roads - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method.<br/>
+
3. Slope angle - As mentioned, slope angle is the second most important factor together with accessibility. Building on steep angle would increase costs of construction and potentially increase the duration of construction. Thus, ensuring the project is finished quickly and cost-effectively would be important..<br/>
4. Elevation - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method.<br/>
+
4. Natural Conservation - it is the least important factor compared to the others. Failure to consider the presence of forests and lakes would endanger the plants and animals in these habitats. However, the costs of these damages are minor compared to the previously mentioned factors. Thus, it's score is relatively low compared to the rest.<br/>
  
 
== Part 5: Suitable land ==
 
== Part 5: Suitable land ==

Revision as of 15:09, 9 November 2019

Part 1: Standard view of study areas

Standard view of study areas

Description

1. Buildings - Classified buildings by color into clinic, construction, garage, place of worship, public, residential, train station, and others.
2. Natural - Classified natural as one single color.
3. Roads - Classified roads into service and track. Any other type of roads were excluded from the study.
4. Elevation - Classified the elevation into colors, representing different heights

Part 2: Raster view of the study areas

Raster view of the study areas

Description

1. Buildings - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are in metres.
2. Natural - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are in metres.
3. Roads - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are in metres.
4. Elevation - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are in metres.

Part 3: Raster view showing the criterion scores of the study areas

Raster view showing the criterion scores of the study areas

Description

1. Buildings - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method.
2. Natural - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method.
3. Roads - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method.
4. Elevation - Classified proximity by color. Numbers are standardized using Min-max method.

Part 4: AHP tables

Pair-wise comparison
Resulting weightage

Description

1. Health Risk - It is the most important factor to take into consideration as this will affect people staying the area, thus it is scored very highly as compared to the other 3 factors.
2. Accessibility - It is the second most important factor together with slope angle. Accessibility to the site would affect the cost required to transport the construction tools and materials for the new building. Making it cost-effective would be important.
3. Slope angle - As mentioned, slope angle is the second most important factor together with accessibility. Building on steep angle would increase costs of construction and potentially increase the duration of construction. Thus, ensuring the project is finished quickly and cost-effectively would be important..
4. Natural Conservation - it is the least important factor compared to the others. Failure to consider the presence of forests and lakes would endanger the plants and animals in these habitats. However, the costs of these damages are minor compared to the previously mentioned factors. Thus, it's score is relatively low compared to the rest.

Part 5: Suitable land

Suitable land

Discussion

Sources

1. Master Plan 2014 Subzone (No Sea)
2. BBBike@Singapore
3. ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) dataset